-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 118
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
ECJ out of sync with JLS 9.6.4.1 (#1097)
* Reverse the changes made for https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=552082 * Tweak for test failures in Jenkins * Implement the recent changes to JLS 9.6.4.1 * Incorporate review comment #1097 (comment) * Additional test case for https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=568240 * Additional regression test for https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=566803 * Review follow up: Get rid of the head-scratch producing enumerator NonJVMS4_7_20_TargetLocation.
- Loading branch information
1 parent
3d72ef7
commit 03658fd
Showing
11 changed files
with
386 additions
and
120 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -1511,11 +1511,7 @@ public interface IProblem { | |
int ConstructorReferenceNotBelow18 = Internal + Syntax + 647; | ||
/** @since 3.10 */ | ||
int ExplicitThisParameterNotInLambda = Internal + Syntax + 648; | ||
/** | ||
This comment has been minimized.
Sorry, something went wrong.
This comment has been minimized.
Sorry, something went wrong.
srikanth-sankaran
Author
Contributor
|
||
* @since 3.10 | ||
* @deprecated Per https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8231435 this problem is no longer raised | ||
*/ | ||
@Deprecated | ||
/** @since 3.10 */ | ||
int ExplicitAnnotationTargetRequired = TypeRelated + 649; | ||
/** @since 3.10 */ | ||
int IllegalTypeForExplicitThis = Internal + Syntax + 650; | ||
|
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
@srikanth-sankaran : I assume this is intended?
If yes, we have to bump ecj batch compiler version & jdt core version bundles (which re-exports this API), because we have API error reported: