ECJ accepts invalid syntax without error

[alienisty]

The following Java code is accepted without errors by eclipse:

public class EclipseParserBug {
  private static void copy(boolean[] src, boolean[] dst) {
    long start=System.nanoTime();
    IntStream.range(0, src.length).parallel().forEach(i -> dst[i] = src[i]))); 	  
    System.out.println("Copy took: " + (System.nanoTime() - start));
  }
}

which is compiled in the following byte code:

// Compiled from EclipseParserBug.java (version 1.8 : 52.0, super bit)
public class EclipseParserBug {
  
  // Method descriptor #6 ()V
  // Stack: 1, Locals: 1
  public EclipseParserBug();
    0  aload_0 [this]
    1  invokespecial java.lang.Object() [8]
    4  return
      Line numbers:
        [pc: 0, line: 1]
      Local variable table:
        [pc: 0, pc: 5] local: this index: 0 type: EclipseParserBug
  
  // Method descriptor #15 ([Z[Z)V
  // Stack: 2, Locals: 4
  private static void copy(boolean[] src, boolean[] dst);
    0  invokestatic java.lang.System.nanoTime() : long [16]
    3  lstore_2 [start]
    4  return
      Line numbers:
        [pc: 0, line: 3]
        [pc: 4, line: 8]
      Local variable table:
        [pc: 0, pc: 5] local: src index: 0 type: boolean[]
        [pc: 0, pc: 5] local: dst index: 1 type: boolean[]
        [pc: 4, pc: 5] local: start index: 2 type: long
}

which is also incorrect.
Note how only the first line of the source code has been compiled, despite having debug information for the rest.
It seems like a very corner case but it could lead to very sneaky and hard to find bugs.

[stephan-herrmann]

Looks like https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=553601

When addressing this issue, we should also add the test case from the other bug.

[trancexpress]

Should be the same as #859 and #125.