-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 119
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[win32][GTK] Remove incomplete win32-gtk implementation #425
[win32][GTK] Remove incomplete win32-gtk implementation #425
Comments
… implementation Win32-GTK implementation was developed in https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=488431 According to my understanding, it was never finished, and nobody uses it. At the same time, its presence routinely confuses me: when I change some build settings for win32, I stumble upon a copy of `make_win32.mak` for win32-gtk, and wonder if I need to change it or not. As per discussion in Bug 488431, the implementation was never finished, and the bug is closed as WONTFIX. Therefore, it would be best to remove it from SWT entirely. Signed-off-by: Alexandr Miloslavskiy <alexandr.miloslavskiy@syntevo.com>
… implementation Win32-GTK implementation was developed in https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=488431 According to my understanding, it was never finished, and nobody uses it. At the same time, its presence routinely confuses me: when I change some build settings for win32, I stumble upon a copy of `make_win32.mak` for win32-gtk, and wonder if I need to change it or not. As per discussion in Bug 488431, the implementation was never finished, and the bug is closed as WONTFIX. Therefore, it would be best to remove it from SWT entirely. Signed-off-by: Alexandr Miloslavskiy <alexandr.miloslavskiy@syntevo.com>
I prepared pull requests: |
… implementation Win32-GTK implementation was developed in https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=488431 According to my understanding, it was never finished, and nobody uses it. At the same time, its presence routinely confuses me: when I change some build settings for win32, I stumble upon a copy of `make_win32.mak` for win32-gtk, and wonder if I need to change it or not. As per discussion in Bug 488431, the implementation was never finished, and the bug is closed as WONTFIX. Therefore, it would be best to remove it from SWT entirely. Signed-off-by: Alexandr Miloslavskiy <alexandr.miloslavskiy@syntevo.com>
Win32-GTK implementation was developed in https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=488431 According to my understanding, it was never finished, and nobody uses it. At the same time, its presence routinely confuses me: when I change some build settings for win32, I stumble upon a copy of `make_win32.mak` for win32-gtk, and wonder if I need to change it or not. As per discussion in Bug 488431, the implementation was never finished, and the bug is closed as WONTFIX. Therefore, it would be best to remove it from SWT entirely. Signed-off-by: Alexandr Miloslavskiy <alexandr.miloslavskiy@syntevo.com>
@akurtakov thanks for your assistance! |
I am currently using |
Whatever doesn't manage to gain enough interest becomes liability for maitainers as we are not aware of any usage but it still complicates our searches, releng work and etc. People should really engage with upstream community and help maintaining things or it ends like this one. |
…in32-gtk implementation" This reverts commit 695fcb3.
…in32-gtk implementation" This reverts commit 695fcb3.
…in32-gtk implementation" This reverts commit 695fcb3.
…in32-gtk implementation" This reverts commit 695fcb3.
Win32-GTK implementation was developed in https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=488431
According to my understanding, it was never finished, and nobody uses it. At the same time, its presence routinely confuses me: when I change some build settings for win32, I stumble upon a copy of
make_win32.mak
for win32-gtk, and wonder if I need to change it or not.As per discussion in Bug 488431, the implementation was never finished, and the bug is closed as WONTFIX.
Therefore, it would be best to remove it from SWT entirely.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: