Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

More information in tripinfo #7822

Closed
MelanieWeber opened this issue Nov 19, 2020 · 5 comments
Closed

More information in tripinfo #7822

MelanieWeber opened this issue Nov 19, 2020 · 5 comments
Assignees
Labels
c:container c:output enhancement p:important more important than default but not 'critical'

Comments

@MelanieWeber
Copy link
Contributor

MelanieWeber commented Nov 19, 2020

We also need the following information in the tripinfo file:
personinfo:

  • for ride and walk: departLane and arrivalLane (departPos/arrivalPos are allready included)
  • for access: depart and arrival

containerinfo:

  • for transship and transport: departLane and arrivalLane (departPos/arrivalPos are allready included)
@rummel123
Copy link
Contributor

If a busStop (containerStop) is used in the routing file, the stop should also be in the tripinfo file (instead of the arrivalLane) as it is for vehicles.

@namdre
Copy link
Contributor

namdre commented Nov 19, 2020

We also need the following information in the tripinfo file:
* for ride and walk: departLane and arrivalLane (departPos/arrivalPos are allready included)
* for transship and transport: departLane and arrivalLane (departPos/arrivalPos are allready included)

In the original design transportables do not care about lanes and only about edges. The default pedestrian model always uses the rightmost lane that allows persons. Thus there is little extra information in the lane index. The edge however is already part of the input. How do you intend to use the lane information?

@rummel123
Copy link
Contributor

The lane is not the important point here (edge would also be adequate).
We need the tracks of the persons and containers, i.e. locations and related times for the evaluation. It would be much easier to get that joined information from the tripinfo file instead of relating the two files (route file, tripinfo file).

@rummel123 rummel123 added the p:important more important than default but not 'critical' label Nov 23, 2020
@namdre
Copy link
Contributor

namdre commented Nov 24, 2020

should be solved via #7632

@namdre
Copy link
Contributor

namdre commented Dec 3, 2020

not easily solved via #7632. Solved instead via project-specific python script as discussed with @rummel123

@namdre namdre closed this as completed Dec 3, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
c:container c:output enhancement p:important more important than default but not 'critical'
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants