Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support integratedTerminal for debugging #6103

Closed
AlexTugarev opened this issue Sep 4, 2019 · 2 comments
Closed

Support integratedTerminal for debugging #6103

AlexTugarev opened this issue Sep 4, 2019 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
debug issues that related to debug functionality enhancement issues that are enhancements to current functionality - nice to haves help wanted issues meant to be picked up, require help

Comments

@AlexTugarev
Copy link
Contributor

Take the Python VS Code extension for instance, it's not possible to use integratedTerminal for launch configs. Though the Terminal opens as expected, it's not getting anything sourced, thus no debugger is attached.

@AlexTugarev AlexTugarev added enhancement issues that are enhancements to current functionality - nice to haves debug issues that related to debug functionality labels Sep 4, 2019
@akosyakov akosyakov added the help wanted issues meant to be picked up, require help label Sep 4, 2019
@svor
Copy link
Contributor

svor commented Oct 4, 2019

Same problem with java debug. Since v0.21.0 Java-debug VS Code extension uses integratedTerminal as a default type of console for debug configurations.

@tsmaeder
Copy link
Contributor

tsmaeder commented Nov 6, 2019

As I understand it, this should not change anything in the way we run the programs, just where the output/input is redirected to.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
debug issues that related to debug functionality enhancement issues that are enhancements to current functionality - nice to haves help wanted issues meant to be picked up, require help
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants