Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature/639 policy store api paging #754

Merged

Conversation

dsmf
Copy link
Contributor

@dsmf dsmf commented Jul 3, 2024

Description

Pre-review checks

Please ensure to do as many of the following checks as possible, before asking for committer review:

/**
* Search criteria.
*
* @param <T> type for value

Check notice

Code scanning / CodeQL

Spurious Javadoc @param tags Note

@param tag "" does not match any actual parameter of constructor "SearchCriteria()".
dsmf added 2 commits July 4, 2024 16:55
…operation for createdOn and validUntil

According to discussion instead of BETWEEN operation there will be the operations AFTER_LOCAL_DATE and BEFORE_LOCAL_DATE. These will be implemented in a later story.
@dsmf dsmf requested a review from ds-jhartmann July 4, 2024 15:11
@dsmf dsmf marked this pull request as ready for review July 4, 2024 15:11
@dsmf
Copy link
Contributor Author

dsmf commented Jul 4, 2024

Hi @ds-jhartmann,

Copy link
Contributor

@ds-jhartmann ds-jhartmann left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM
as discussed, we need to check the image push workflow first for this to be tested, so I would prefer to keep this PR open until then

@dsmf dsmf force-pushed the feature/639-policy-store-api-paging branch from 47a5906 to a3435f5 Compare July 8, 2024 16:32
@ds-jhartmann ds-jhartmann merged commit 1b34b73 into eclipse-tractusx:main Jul 8, 2024
29 of 30 checks passed
@dsmf dsmf deleted the feature/639-policy-store-api-paging branch July 15, 2024 14:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants