Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use local variable instead of a field for contentCompressionEnabled #71

Merged

Conversation

laeubi
Copy link
Member

@laeubi laeubi commented Oct 2, 2023

Using a field for contentCompressionEnabled is not required as all data is only accessed locally.

Using a local variable makes the code better readable and prevents any problems with possibly concurrent access. Beside that it should be q tiny bit more performant.

Using a field for contentCompressionEnabled is not required as all data
is only accessed locally.

Using a local variable makes the code better readable and prevents any
problems with possibly concurrent access. Beside that it should be q
tiny bit more performant.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants