We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
especially when we have in simulation routing, otherwise maybe optional
Migrated from http://sumo.dlr.de/ticket/1825
{ "status": "closed", "changetime": "2015-08-26T08:07:20Z", "description": "especially when we have in simulation routing, otherwise maybe optional", "reporter": "behrisch", "cc": "", "resolution": "fixed", "_ts": "1440576440770794", "component": "simulation general (micro)", "summary": "ignore-route-errors should discard vehicles", "priority": "major", "keywords": "", "time": "2015-06-24T08:23:12Z", "milestone": "0.24.0", "owner": "behrisch", "type": "enhancement" }
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Sorry, something went wrong.
@behrisch committed c5359e7 (aka r18501): skipping unrouted vehicles, refs #1825
@namdre commented:
what about temporary lane-closing where the route is disconnected at insertion time but becomes available later?
@behrisch commented:
doc missing
OK so they get discarded only in simulation routing and only if they had no route before (defined by trips).
behrisch
No branches or pull requests
especially when we have in simulation routing, otherwise maybe optional
Migrated from http://sumo.dlr.de/ticket/1825
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: