Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ignore-route-errors should discard vehicles (trac #1825) #1825

Closed
behrisch opened this issue Jun 24, 2015 · 5 comments
Closed

ignore-route-errors should discard vehicles (trac #1825) #1825

behrisch opened this issue Jun 24, 2015 · 5 comments
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@behrisch
Copy link
Contributor

especially when we have in simulation routing, otherwise maybe optional

Migrated from http://sumo.dlr.de/ticket/1825

{
    "status": "closed", 
    "changetime": "2015-08-26T08:07:20Z", 
    "description": "especially when we have in simulation routing, otherwise maybe optional", 
    "reporter": "behrisch", 
    "cc": "", 
    "resolution": "fixed", 
    "_ts": "1440576440770794", 
    "component": "simulation general (micro)", 
    "summary": "ignore-route-errors should discard vehicles", 
    "priority": "major", 
    "keywords": "", 
    "time": "2015-06-24T08:23:12Z", 
    "milestone": "0.24.0", 
    "owner": "behrisch", 
    "type": "enhancement"
}
@behrisch
Copy link
Contributor Author

  • @behrisch changed owner from "" to "behrisch"
  • @behrisch changed status from "new" to "accepted"

@behrisch
Copy link
Contributor Author

@behrisch committed c5359e7 (aka r18501):
skipping unrouted vehicles, refs #1825

@behrisch
Copy link
Contributor Author

@namdre commented:

what about temporary lane-closing where the route is disconnected at insertion time but becomes available later?

@behrisch
Copy link
Contributor Author

@behrisch commented:

doc missing

@behrisch
Copy link
Contributor Author

OK so they get discarded only in simulation routing and only if they had no route before (defined by trips).

  • @behrisch changed resolution from "" to "fixed"
  • @behrisch changed status from "accepted" to "closed"

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant