vertx throws "IllegalStateException: Failed to create cache dir" though "vertx.disableFileCaching=true"

[m0]

I am using vertx for a small web service that should run without disk write access.
Sadly vertx insists in having a writeable cache directory though I set "vertx.disableFileCaching=true":
java.lang.IllegalStateException: Failed to create cache dir
at io.vertx.core.impl.FileResolver.setupCacheDir(FileResolver.java:293)
at io.vertx.core.impl.FileResolver.(FileResolver.java:86)
at io.vertx.core.impl.VertxImpl.(VertxImpl.java:175)
at io.vertx.core.impl.VertxImpl.(VertxImpl.java:142)
at io.vertx.core.impl.VertxFactoryImpl.vertx(VertxFactoryImpl.java:42)
at io.vertx.core.Vertx.vertx(Vertx.java:90)
at com.sipgate.litc.HealthService.start(HealthService.java:18)
at com.sipgate.litc.Main.main(Main.java:20)

I had a quick look at FileResolver.java and would expect any cacheFile handling to be skipped when ENABLE_CACHING is false, but as far as I understand the code, the public interface of at least FileResolver would have to change.
Before digging deeper into the code and developing a patch, I would like to know if changing the behaviour to match what I expect, is appreciated.

Do I miss something?

[tsegismont]

You should set "vertx.disableFileCPResolving" to true instead. 2017-04-10 10:14 GMT+02:00 Moritz Maisel <notifications@github.com>:

…

I am using vertx for a small web service that should run without disk write access. Sadly vertx insists in having a writeable cache directory though I set "vertx.disableFileCaching=true": java.lang.IllegalStateException: Failed to create cache dir at io.vertx.core.impl.FileResolver.setupCacheDir(FileResolver.java:293) at io.vertx.core.impl.FileResolver.(FileResolver.java:86) at io.vertx.core.impl.VertxImpl.(VertxImpl.java:175) at io.vertx.core.impl.VertxImpl.(VertxImpl.java:142) at io.vertx.core.impl.VertxFactoryImpl.vertx(VertxFactoryImpl.java:42) at io.vertx.core.Vertx.vertx(Vertx.java:90) at com.sipgate.litc.HealthService.start(HealthService.java:18) at com.sipgate.litc.Main.main(Main.java:20) I had a quick look at FileResolver.java and would expect any cacheFile handling to be skipped when ENABLE_CACHING is false, but as far as I understand the code, the public interface of at least FileResolver would have to change. Before digging deeper into the code and developing a patch, I would like to know if changing the behaviour to match what I expect, is appreciated. Do I miss something? — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#1931>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABbltvj-nzxJBRfg0f6fg0ioW6jk_UYiks5rueT3gaJpZM4M4dDz> .

[m0]

Oh, obviously I misssed that flag when I looked over the code. Thank's for the fast response! 👍