New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Chrome debugger integration #252
Chrome debugger integration #252
Conversation
ba6a6d6
to
1add0b5
Compare
Start packaging chrome debugger Signed-off-by: Andrew Obuchowicz <aobuchow@redhat.com>
Start refactorization of node/firefox/chrome debug adapter logic Signed-off-by: Andrew Obuchowicz <aobuchow@redhat.com>
Refactorings for debugTab's and variables used in DebugDelegates Signed-off-by: Andrew Obuchowicz <aobuchow@redhat.com>
Refactorings for debugTab's and DebugDelegates Signed-off-by: Andrew Obuchowicz <aobuchow@redhat.com>
1add0b5
to
94805c8
Compare
@@ -4,7 +4,8 @@ bin.includes = META-INF/,\ | |||
.,\ | |||
plugin.xml,\ | |||
language-servers/package-lock.json,\ | |||
language-servers/node_modules/,\ | |||
language-servers/chrome-debug-adapter/extension/node_modules/,\ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We shouldn't have to do that if we can have the module treated as regular npm in node_modules.
</arguments> | ||
<workingDirectory>language-servers/</workingDirectory> | ||
</configuration> | ||
</execution> | ||
</executions> | ||
</plugin> | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No need for those extra lines.
@@ -0,0 +1,87 @@ | |||
--- org.eclipse.wildwebdeveloper/src/org/eclipse/wildwebdeveloper/InitializeLaunchConfigurations.java |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Seems like some garbage file
Can we close it as it seems like #256 replaces it? |
Fix #230