Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Non-UTF8 cmdr names #44

Closed
maddavo opened this issue Dec 5, 2015 · 5 comments
Closed

Non-UTF8 cmdr names #44

maddavo opened this issue Dec 5, 2015 · 5 comments
Labels

Comments

@maddavo
Copy link

maddavo commented Dec 5, 2015

Just got some non-UTF8 in the Uploader-ID via EDDN. Any chance of filtering that out before transmitting?

@Marginal
Copy link
Contributor

Marginal commented Dec 5, 2015

I thought I was doing so (or, rather, that the module that I'm using was doing so).
Can you provide a rough timestamp and station so that I can find the message on eddb and use it for testing?

@Marginal
Copy link
Contributor

Marginal commented Dec 5, 2015

Did you receive this message OK ?

I believe the "\u00e9" is caused by the way that eddb displays the message - my testing on a local gateway indicates that the message was correctly received

Looks like the "\u00e9" in that message is happening inside the gateway. I've raised issue EDCD/EDDN#37

@maddavo
Copy link
Author

maddavo commented Dec 5, 2015

Hi - sorry - my timezone is probably way off urs. The Uploader ID was "Knnuður" . Quite a few came through from him/her today. Here is one line post my parsing:
EXPLOSIVES 460 0 20737H - 2015-12-05 04:37:07 # Knnuður_E:D Market Connector [Windows]_1.8.7.0

@maddavo
Copy link
Author

maddavo commented Dec 5, 2015

Ah, I found the EDDN message...

https://ross.eddb.io/eddn/log/6392802

Marginal added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 5, 2015
@Marginal
Copy link
Contributor

Marginal commented Dec 5, 2015

Fixed in Release 1.88.

@Marginal Marginal added the bug label Jan 10, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants