-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add tests #14
Comments
Thanks, that's more precise now. |
The advantage of |
You decide, if you like tinytest I will give a go. |
It's worth a try. It is purely additive: add a |
BTW, the test fails in the same way when run in the CRAN version 0.3.16. It's enough to put the following code in the
and I get
As mentioned above, this is with the released version. |
🤷♂️ I really think it's a known (to calls of Back to real work, and end to the staccato over this topic. Later... |
Thanks for the PR. I should have done that a while ago but because some low-dependency packages (such as I also just increased the version number to signal this 'in-between releases' status and made a fairly routine update to the CI script I use (and similarly update in a few other places). It would be great if you could rebase your other branch to the main one here. Edit: And I was of course too optimistic as switching to a matrix build with macOS promptly goes belly-up over Fortran. I'll disable the macOS part. |
You're welcome. My pleasure! I don't have any macOS so I can't do anything there. I rebased my other branch as suggested and will add tests for the new stuff there... Having tests will really make it easier to see if I goof up while trying to fix things! The tests already relevaled two things I overlooked (one was in SetCMethod which I hadn't looked at). I currently do not plan to add tests for |
No macOS here either, and that is the part that Travis CI will make us pay so off it is. [ I am currently reworking / rebranding my Travis setup script as it works unchanged at Travis, GitHub Actions, Azure Pipelines, ... so we could always run it somewhere else. ] And yes, having tests is good. I'll add something simply for |
Currently there are no tests driven from
tests/
either directly or via a test runner in the package but only tests relying on help page examples that do not check the output of the compiled functions.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: