"Disappearing codes"

[albertocottica]

Autocomplete does not always suggest all codes.

Amelia to reproduce this.

[danohu]

It looks like the autocomplete only shows you codes that you have created yourself.

This was implemented intentionally (issue #30). In retrospect it seems bad/confusing, especially considering that the 'forking' concept was never fully implemented.

@albertocottica -- could you ask with Amelia whether this explains her "disappearing codes". i.e. do codes disappear if (and only if) they were first created by somebody else.

[nb @albertocottica and @tanius -- this meas taxonomy terms do have a user id associated with them, so the architectural issues about separating codes by authorship are simpler than we thought on the call]

[danohu]

So, I suggest

quick-fix: have autocomplete show everybody's codes (this is a 2-line change)

medium-term plan to do something like:

• showing everybody's codes, but differentiating which are your ow
• doing some kind of auto-forking

but this will need another round of discussion to work out precisely how we want collaborative annotation to work

[albertocottica]

Agree.

On 6 Sep 2016 17:06, "danohuiginn" notifications@github.com wrote:

So, I suggest

quick-fix: have autocomplete show everybody's codes (this is a 2-line
change)

medium-term plan to do something like:

• showing everybody's codes, but differentiating which are your ow
• doing some kind of auto-forking

but this will need another round of discussion to work out precisely how
we want collaborative annotation to work

—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#56 (comment),
or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AB4p5h3XOGfvFqvQCCwRTOG_l1IHwSlRks5qnYFdgaJpZM4J15mI
.

[albertocottica]

@danohuiginn the discussion in #60 is now done. Can we close this issue?