Skip to content

Evaluation and Metrics

Marios Papachristou edited this page Aug 9, 2018 · 1 revision

Evaluation and Metrics

Evaluating the Accuracy of the Algorithm

Detection Accuracy

Consider a statute and the links that point to it (in paragraph level). We consider applying the links in chronological order. We define the Detection Accuracy as:

Note that one paragraph might contain more than one amendment. We consider a detection successful iff there is at least one detection (since we do not know the number of amendments a priori).

Querying Accuracy

Then the number of successful queries divided by the number of amendments defines Query Accuracy

Overall Accuracy

For the overall Detection / Querying Accuracy we take the mean of the individual accuracies.

Algorithm Evaluation

We followed a hybrid approach on detecting amendments. This technique yielded mean detection accuracy of 89% and mean querying accuracy of 70%. The cascaded systems mean accuracy was 62%.

Improvements

The following improvements can be done in order to increase the accuracies:

Detection:

  1. Add more parts-of-legal-text such as υποπαράγραφος and στοιχείο. Difficulty: Easy. Workaround: Read more texts
  2. Train custom dependency analyzer. Difficulty: Hard Workaround: Research

Querying

  1. Clean up Government Gazette Texts Dificulty: Medium Workaround: Read more texts