Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

accuracy lower than that in the paper #30

Open
YamengGu opened this issue Apr 12, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

accuracy lower than that in the paper #30

YamengGu opened this issue Apr 12, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@YamengGu
Copy link

Hi,

I edited the input data from dataset 2a which included both data and label. I run the code and found that each subject's accuracy is lower than that you described in the paper. What should I do? for example, my subject 1 best accuracy is 77% while yours is 88. my second subject is 47% while yours is 61%. other subjects keep the same trend.

Here is the link for my input data, just in case my input data is wrong: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1WQaB4G2i6z8r6drgbJ9gF5aZCrA_Ydek/view?usp=sharing

Thanks,

Yameng

@eeyhsong
Copy link
Owner

Do you use the example data I supported in the google driver?

@YamengGu
Copy link
Author

YamengGu commented Apr 14, 2024 via email

@eeyhsong
Copy link
Owner

eeyhsong commented Apr 15, 2024

Where did you get the data? Did you perform some preprocessing such as band-pass filter and z-score?
refer to code.

Best,
Song

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants