New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
refactor: replace RawPMTHit
with RawTrackerHit
#508
Conversation
RawPMTHit
with RawTrackerHit
RawPMTHit
with RawTrackerHit
d8b091c
to
5dd5491
Compare
CI failures are unrelated to this PR (and currently happening on |
Why is it segfaulting now? Just noticed in main too ... |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good. Minor suggestion for future resiliency.
Set to auto-merge, pending unresolved conversation. |
I also applied these changes to the Juggler MR |
Same exact CI failures are happening on unrelated PR #524, so it seems like this is a general problem. |
Oddly enough, the last push to |
Can you restart a job on main? Might be due to jana upgrade... |
Sure, re-running the last PR merge commit: https://github.com/eic/EICrecon/actions/runs/4320254537 (which passed all CI checks before this) |
Same failures |
And it's one of those 'fun' failures that doesn't fail inside valgrind... |
Briefly, what does this PR introduce?
edm4eic::RawPMTHit
is basically a duplicatedatatype
ofedm4eic::RawTrackerHit
, so let's useRawTrackerHit
and deprecateRawPMTHit
.See also eic/EDM4eic#22
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Please check if this PR fulfills the following:
Does this PR introduce breaking changes? What changes might users need to make to their code?
No (except in #393)
Does this PR change default behavior?
No