Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Separate workflow for checks #1052

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

Conversation

phadej
Copy link
Collaborator

@phadej phadej commented Dec 6, 2023

I'm experimenting with an idea of generating a separate workflow for checks which are enough to do once. E.g. hlint is run once. cabal check does the same for every GHC.

Having such checks in a separate workflow, would:

  • allow per-GHC builds to pass even if there is e.g HLint issue
  • allow more parallism
  • simplify structure

The goal is that haskell-ci would be able to generate lints.yml file too, as it looks there are potentially a lot of setup to do.

@phadej phadej marked this pull request as draft December 6, 2023 18:12
@phadej phadej force-pushed the separate-workflow-for-checks branch from 28c6989 to 23cb160 Compare December 6, 2023 18:15
I'm experimenting with an idea of generating a separate workflow
for checks which are enough to do once. E.g. hlint is run once.
`cabal check` does the same for every GHC.

Having such checks in a separate workflow, would:
- allow per-GHC builds to pass even if there is e.g HLint issue
- allow more parallism
- simplify structure

The goal is that `haskell-ci` would be able to generate
`lints.yml` file too, as it looks there are potentially
a lot of setup to do.
@phadej phadej force-pushed the separate-workflow-for-checks branch from 23cb160 to c35aa38 Compare December 6, 2023 18:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant