Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Fix for 1 vulnerabilities #7

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

snyk-bot
Copy link

Snyk has created this PR to fix one or more vulnerable packages in the `npm` dependencies of this project.

Changes included in this PR

  • Changes to the following files to upgrade the vulnerable dependencies to a fixed version:
    • syft/pkg/cataloger/javascript/test-fixtures/pkg-json/package.json

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed

With an upgrade:
Severity Priority Score (*) Issue Breaking Change Exploit Maturity
high severity 768/1000
Why? Proof of Concept exploit, Recently disclosed, Has a fix available, CVSS 7.5
Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)
SNYK-JS-ANSIREGEX-1583908
Yes Proof of Concept

(*) Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.

Commit messages
Package name: npm-audit-report The new version differs by 6 commits.
  • 5ca3209 2.0.0
  • afe44c6 force color support in CI
  • 1148a75 Version 2 rewrite for Arborist audit data
  • 5102576 simplify test fixture handling
  • e179501 Update project settings to new standards
  • 620842a feat: make this method synchronous

See the full diff

Package name: standard The new version differs by 250 commits.

See the full diff

Package name: tap The new version differs by 250 commits.
  • bc49fb7 15.0.0
  • 4378608 remove publishConfig beta tag
  • 2c2e75f provide mkdirRecursive polyfill for old node versions
  • 8f4c855 correctly specify 10.0.x versions
  • 5e61672 update deps
  • c44c418 Support 10.0 and test in CI
  • dc5c841 tcompare@5.0.4
  • 385b6d2 Add .taprc.yml/yaml handling to change log
  • 4f87466 just run regular test script as snap script
  • 315a921 delete FORCE_COLOR/NO_COLOR rather than setting to '0'
  • 564e96f Add detection for .yaml and .yml
  • 75bae93 update cli doc
  • c1289bf 15.0.0-3
  • d6fe32f Do not CI on node 10
  • d2e0428 do not use equals() alias in self-test
  • 3f787c4 tell npm to be colorful in CI
  • 1512818 run tests with color on github actions
  • 4626fa1 Docs: update documentation for tap v15
  • 02d536b libtap@1.0.1
  • f7c7c58 update cli doc
  • 2aa497c 15.0.0-2
  • 8d7f62e Add support for overriding libtap's internal settings
  • 29eed63 new snapshot folder layout
  • 3a28d4d update libtap git ref to isaacs/tap-v15-prep branch

See the full diff

Package name: update-notifier The new version differs by 23 commits.

See the full diff

Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.


Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report

🛠 Adjust project settings

📚 Read more about Snyk's upgrade and patch logic

…n to reduce vulnerabilities

The following vulnerabilities are fixed with an upgrade:
- https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JS-ANSIREGEX-1583908
@pull-request-quantifier-deprecated

This PR has 10 quantified lines of changes. In general, a change size of upto 200 lines is ideal for the best PR experience!


Quantification details

Label      : Extra Small
Size       : +5 -5
Percentile : 4%

Total files changed: 1

Change summary by file extension:
.json : +5 -5

Change counts above are quantified counts, based on the PullRequestQuantifier customizations.

Why proper sizing of changes matters

Optimal pull request sizes drive a better predictable PR flow as they strike a
balance between between PR complexity and PR review overhead. PRs within the
optimal size (typical small, or medium sized PRs) mean:

  • Fast and predictable releases to production:
    • Optimal size changes are more likely to be reviewed faster with fewer
      iterations.
    • Similarity in low PR complexity drives similar review times.
  • Review quality is likely higher as complexity is lower:
    • Bugs are more likely to be detected.
    • Code inconsistencies are more likely to be detetcted.
  • Knowledge sharing is improved within the participants:
    • Small portions can be assimilated better.
  • Better engineering practices are exercised:
    • Solving big problems by dividing them in well contained, smaller problems.
    • Exercising separation of concerns within the code changes.

What can I do to optimize my changes

  • Use the PullRequestQuantifier to quantify your PR accurately
    • Create a context profile for your repo using the context generator
    • Exclude files that are not necessary to be reviewed or do not increase the review complexity. Example: Autogenerated code, docs, project IDE setting files, binaries, etc. Check out the Excluded section from your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Understand your typical change complexity, drive towards the desired complexity by adjusting the label mapping in your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
    • Only use the labels that matter to you, see context specification to customize your prquantifier.yaml context profile.
  • Change your engineering behaviors
    • For PRs that fall outside of the desired spectrum, review the details and check if:
      • Your PR could be split in smaller, self-contained PRs instead
      • Your PR only solves one particular issue. (For example, don't refactor and code new features in the same PR).

How to interpret the change counts in git diff output

  • One line was added: +1 -0
  • One line was deleted: +0 -1
  • One line was modified: +1 -1 (git diff doesn't know about modified, it will
    interpret that line like one addition plus one deletion)
  • Change percentiles: Change characteristics (addition, deletion, modification)
    of this PR in relation to all other PRs within the repository.


Was this comment helpful? 👍  :ok_hand:  :thumbsdown: (Email)
Customize PullRequestQuantifier for this repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
1 participant