Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add missing hash fields to process.parent: attempt 2 #739

Merged
merged 5 commits into from Feb 4, 2020

Conversation

marshallmain
Copy link
Contributor

Same idea as #698 redone to integrate with intermediate data format changes.
Recently process.parent fields that are identical to the process fields were added to ECS, but the hash fields that are nested under "process" did not get added to process.parent. This PR adds "process.parent" to the list of nestings in "hash" and also support for nesting fields at levels other than the top level of the destination schema using the '.' notation (e.g. process.parent). Previously nested fields could only be inserted at the top level.

Copy link
Contributor

@webmat webmat left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! Thanks Marshall :-)

@webmat webmat merged commit 4ff90b3 into elastic:master Feb 4, 2020
webmat pushed a commit to webmat/ecs that referenced this pull request Mar 4, 2020
- code_signature (elastic#733)
- second entry for elastic#739 in the schema section, mentioning the addition of `process.parent.hash`

Also adjusted the wording of elastic#731 and elastic#747.
dcode pushed a commit to dcode/ecs that referenced this pull request Apr 15, 2020
This issue also adds flexibility to the reuse mechanism, in allowing us to nest at a nested destination
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants