Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make it clear that the cardinality benchmark results in docs are an example and user results might vary #18231

Closed
colings86 opened this issue May 10, 2016 · 1 comment
Labels
:Analytics/Aggregations Aggregations >docs General docs changes help wanted adoptme

Comments

@colings86
Copy link
Contributor

This issue was identified in this forum post: https://discuss.elastic.co/t/high-approximation-error-rate-of-cardinality-aggregation-for-low-cardinality-sets/49574

We should make it clearer in the documentation that the benchmark results in the 'Counts are Apporximate' section may be different from a users results if they perform the same test since the error depends on how the values in their dataset hash (specifically how many leading zeros are on the hash values)

@elasticmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

Pinging @elastic/es-search-aggs

polyfractal added a commit to polyfractal/elasticsearch that referenced this issue Oct 18, 2018
Adds a bit more clarification about how accuracy is dependent
on the dataset in question.

Closes elastic#18231
polyfractal added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 22, 2018
Adds a bit more clarification about how accuracy is dependent
on the dataset in question.

Closes #18231
polyfractal added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 22, 2018
Adds a bit more clarification about how accuracy is dependent
on the dataset in question.

Closes #18231
kcm pushed a commit that referenced this issue Oct 30, 2018
Adds a bit more clarification about how accuracy is dependent
on the dataset in question.

Closes #18231
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
:Analytics/Aggregations Aggregations >docs General docs changes help wanted adoptme
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants