New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
WKT polygon format validated with geo_shape, where coerce set to true #35059
Comments
Pinging @elastic/es-search-aggs |
Indeed, the WKT parser ignores the @nknize what do you think? Should we make WKT parser more forgiving if |
I think this was an oversight on my part. The spec does require WKT polygons to be closed but |
WKT parser now automatically closes open polygons similar to GeoJSON parser if coerce flag in mapping is set to true. Closes to elastic#35059
WKT parser now automatically closes open polygons similar to GeoJSON parser if coerce flag in mapping is set to true. Closes to elastic#35059
WKT parser now automatically closes open polygons similar to GeoJSON parser if coerce flag in mapping is set to true. Closes to #35059
WKT parser now automatically closes open polygons similar to GeoJSON parser if coerce flag in mapping is set to true. Closes to #35059
Fixed by #35414 |
WKT parser now automatically closes open polygons similar to GeoJSON parser if coerce flag in mapping is set to true. Closes to elastic#35059
@nknize @imotov I don't see the |
Explains the effect of the coerce parameter on the geo_shape field. Relates elastic#35059
…astic#43340) Explains the effect of the coerce parameter on the geo_shape field. Relates elastic#35059
Good day, trying to integrate twitter location data in WKT format, run into following issue:
System
jvm: 1.8
plugins: raw docker img from https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/current/docker.html
Description of the problem including expected versus actual behavior:
Different validation rules for WKT vs own format
Steps to reproduce:
Output:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: