Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fs Gateway: Add (native) file lock to ensure two nodes in a split brain are not updating same gateway #481

Closed
ppearcy opened this issue Nov 5, 2010 · 1 comment

Comments

@ppearcy
Copy link
Contributor

ppearcy commented Nov 5, 2010

Add file lock to gateway to ensure two nodes in a split brain are not updating same gateway. This should be able to prevent index corruption with two clusters split brained trying to write to same gateway.

In order to disable it, set gateway.fs.snapshot_lock to false.

@kimchy
Copy link
Member

kimchy commented Nov 6, 2010

Fs Gateway: Add (native) file lock to ensure two nodes in a split brain are not updating same gateway, closed by 6b952f6.

medcl pushed a commit to medcl/elasticsearch that referenced this issue Jul 1, 2011
williamrandolph pushed a commit to williamrandolph/elasticsearch that referenced this issue Jun 4, 2020
Spark 1.4 relies on a case insensitive match that forbiding the use of
camel case options
Update documentation

relates elastic#481
mindw pushed a commit to mindw/elasticsearch that referenced this issue Sep 5, 2022
…#481)

MPC-4694: added lisa sandbox

* added lisa sandbox


Approved-by: fabien
emilykmarx pushed a commit to emilykmarx/elasticsearch that referenced this issue Dec 26, 2023
Currently, all fields named `message` are mapped to be excluded
from the `.keyword` and `.raw`. This is rather strict, and need only
be applied to the top-level `message` field. All nested `**.*.message`
fields should be treated like any old field.

Fixes elastic#481
emilykmarx pushed a commit to emilykmarx/elasticsearch that referenced this issue Dec 26, 2023
emilykmarx pushed a commit to emilykmarx/elasticsearch that referenced this issue Dec 26, 2023
This issue was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants