[ML] Get inference models is not an admin action #105346
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Hi @davidkyle, I've created a changelog YAML for you. |
|
Pinging @elastic/ml-core (Team:ML) |
jonathan-buttner
approved these changes
Feb 9, 2024
davidkyle
commented
Feb 9, 2024
davidkyle
added
the
auto-merge
martijnvg
pushed a commit
to martijnvg/elasticsearch
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 12, 2024
The GET Inference models action is a read only action but incorrectly requires admin access. This change corrects that situation and allows non privileged users to list the models. A rolling upgrade test has been run on my local machine to check this change is valid
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The GET Inference models action is a read only action but incorrectly requires admin access. This change corrects that situation and allows non privileged users to list the models.
A rolling upgrade test has been run on my local machine to check this change is valid