fix IndexResponse#toString to print out shards info #20562
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
IndexResponse#toString method outputs an error caused by the shards object needing to be wrapped into another object. It is fixed by calling a different variant of Strings.toString(XContent) which accepts a second boolean argument that makes sure that a new object is created before outputting ShardInfo. I didn't change ShardInfo#toString directly as whether it needs a new object or not very much depends on where it is printed out. IndexResponse seemed a specific case as the rest of the info were not json, hence the shards object was the first one, but it is usually not the case.
javanna
added
>bug
review
:Core/Infra/Transport API
nik9000
approved these changes
Sep 19, 2016
|
@elasticmachine, retest this please |
javanna
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 20, 2016
IndexResponse#toString method outputs an error caused by the shards object needing to be wrapped into another object. It is fixed by calling a different variant of Strings.toString(XContent) which accepts a second boolean argument that makes sure that a new object is created before outputting ShardInfo. I didn't change ShardInfo#toString directly as whether it needs a new object or not very much depends on where it is printed out. IndexResponse seemed a specific case as the rest of the info were not json, hence the shards object was the first one, but it is usually not the case.
javanna
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 20, 2016
IndexResponse#toString method outputs an error caused by the shards object needing to be wrapped into another object. It is fixed by calling a different variant of Strings.toString(XContent) which accepts a second boolean argument that makes sure that a new object is created before outputting ShardInfo. I didn't change ShardInfo#toString directly as whether it needs a new object or not very much depends on where it is printed out. IndexResponse seemed a specific case as the rest of the info were not json, hence the shards object was the first one, but it is usually not the case.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
IndexResponse#toString method outputs an error caused by the shards object needing to be wrapped into another object. It is fixed by calling a different variant of Strings.toString(XContent) which accepts a second boolean argument that makes sure that a new object is created before outputting ShardInfo. I didn't change ShardInfo#toString directly as whether it needs a new object or not very much depends on where it is printed out. IndexResponse seemed a specific case as the rest of the info were not json, hence the shards object was the first one, but it is usually not the case.