New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Forbid trappy methods from java.time #28476
Merged
DaveCTurner
merged 6 commits into
elastic:master
from
DaveCTurner:2018-02-01-java-time-forbid-trappy-methods
Feb 2, 2018
Merged
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
94a4b3f
Forbid trappy-looking methods in java.time
DaveCTurner b5a536d
Preserve offset of (ZonedDateTime) value in IngestDocument#deepCopy()
DaveCTurner 3b2a672
Add test showing problem in IngestDocument#deepCopy()
DaveCTurner 838dfac
Treat ZonedDateTime as a value type
DaveCTurner f88b92e
Merge branch 'master' into 2018-02-01-java-time-forbid-trappy-methods
DaveCTurner e28be62
Merge branch 'master' into 2018-02-01-java-time-forbid-trappy-methods
DaveCTurner File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
TBH I'm wondering whether this could just use
zonedDateTime
directly, since it is supposed to have value semantics. Put differently, why not also deep-copy theLocalDateTime
andZoneId
and so on?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not sure I understand. does it matter?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It does but I should have added a test to show this. It only very rarely matters, which is why it's trappy. I added a test.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmm, ok, I forgot I'd made that original comment, but I think I was answering a different question in my previous reply.
The question is why not simply this:
I thought this would be ok because
ZonedDateTime
is immutable and we shouldn't be looking at reference equality on it. If that's not fine, because we do want the contents of the copy to share no references with the original for some reason, then what we do here doesn't do that since it makes a shallow copy of theZonedDateTime
, because it copies theLocalDateTime
instance within.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
++ on that