New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Make ILM force merging best effort #43246
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
It's possible for force merges kicked off by ILM to silently stop (due to a node relocating for example). In which case, the segment count may not reach what the user configured. In the subsequent `SegmentCountStep` waiting for the expected segment count may wait indefinitely. Because of this, this commit makes force merges "best effort" and then changes the `SegmentCountStep` to simply report (at INFO level) if the merge was not successful. Relates to elastic#42824 Resolves elastic#43245
dakrone
added
>bug
:Data Management/ILM+SLM
Index and Snapshot lifecycle management
v8.0.0
v7.2.0
v7.0.2
v7.3.0
v7.1.2
labels
Jun 14, 2019
Pinging @elastic/es-core-features |
gwbrown
approved these changes
Jun 14, 2019
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
dakrone
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 17, 2019
It's possible for force merges kicked off by ILM to silently stop (due to a node relocating for example). In which case, the segment count may not reach what the user configured. In the subsequent `SegmentCountStep` waiting for the expected segment count may wait indefinitely. Because of this, this commit makes force merges "best effort" and then changes the `SegmentCountStep` to simply report (at INFO level) if the merge was not successful. Relates to #42824 Resolves #43245
dakrone
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 17, 2019
It's possible for force merges kicked off by ILM to silently stop (due to a node relocating for example). In which case, the segment count may not reach what the user configured. In the subsequent `SegmentCountStep` waiting for the expected segment count may wait indefinitely. Because of this, this commit makes force merges "best effort" and then changes the `SegmentCountStep` to simply report (at INFO level) if the merge was not successful. Relates to #42824 Resolves #43245
dakrone
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 17, 2019
It's possible for force merges kicked off by ILM to silently stop (due to a node relocating for example). In which case, the segment count may not reach what the user configured. In the subsequent `SegmentCountStep` waiting for the expected segment count may wait indefinitely. Because of this, this commit makes force merges "best effort" and then changes the `SegmentCountStep` to simply report (at INFO level) if the merge was not successful. Relates to #42824 Resolves #43245
dakrone
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 17, 2019
It's possible for force merges kicked off by ILM to silently stop (due to a node relocating for example). In which case, the segment count may not reach what the user configured. In the subsequent `SegmentCountStep` waiting for the expected segment count may wait indefinitely. Because of this, this commit makes force merges "best effort" and then changes the `SegmentCountStep` to simply report (at INFO level) if the merge was not successful. Relates to #42824 Resolves #43245
jkakavas
pushed a commit
to jkakavas/elasticsearch
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 27, 2019
It's possible for force merges kicked off by ILM to silently stop (due to a node relocating for example). In which case, the segment count may not reach what the user configured. In the subsequent `SegmentCountStep` waiting for the expected segment count may wait indefinitely. Because of this, this commit makes force merges "best effort" and then changes the `SegmentCountStep` to simply report (at INFO level) if the merge was not successful. Relates to elastic#42824 Resolves elastic#43245
31 tasks
This was referenced Dec 23, 2020
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
>bug
:Data Management/ILM+SLM
Index and Snapshot lifecycle management
v7.0.2
v7.1.2
v7.2.0
v7.3.0
v8.0.0-alpha1
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
It's possible for force merges kicked off by ILM to silently stop (due
to a node relocating for example). In which case, the segment count may
not reach what the user configured. In the subsequent
SegmentCountStep
waiting for the expected segment count may wait indefinitely. Because of
this, this commit makes force merges "best effort" and then changes the
SegmentCountStep
to simply report (at INFO level) if the merge was notsuccessful.
Relates to #42824
Resolves #43245