Allow forcemerge in the hot phase for ILM policies #52073
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This commit changes the `forcemerge` action to also be allowed in the `hot` phase for policies. The forcemerge will occur after a rollover, and allows users to take advantage of higher disk speeds for performing the force merge (on a separate node type, for example). On caveat with this is that a `forcemerge` in the `hot` phase *MUST* be accompanied by a `rollover` action. ILM validates policies to ensure this is the case. Resolves elastic#43165
dakrone
added
>enhancement
:Data Management/ILM+SLM
|
Pinging @elastic/es-core-features (:Core/Features/ILM+SLM) |
andreidan
approved these changes
Feb 7, 2020
x-pack/plugin/core/src/test/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/core/ilm/LifecyclePolicyTests.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
probakowski
approved these changes
Feb 7, 2020
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM, thanks @dakrone ! I've added one small nit (optional)
x-pack/plugin/core/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/core/ilm/TimeseriesLifecycleType.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
x-pack/plugin/core/src/test/java/org/elasticsearch/xpack/core/ilm/LifecyclePolicyTests.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
dakrone
added a commit
to dakrone/elasticsearch
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 7, 2020
* Allow forcemerge in the hot phase for ILM policies This commit changes the `forcemerge` action to also be allowed in the `hot` phase for policies. The forcemerge will occur after a rollover, and allows users to take advantage of higher disk speeds for performing the force merge (on a separate node type, for example). On caveat with this is that a `forcemerge` in the `hot` phase *MUST* be accompanied by a `rollover` action. ILM validates policies to ensure this is the case. Resolves elastic#43165 * Use anyMatch instead of findAny in validation * Make randomTimeseriesLifecyclePolicy single-pass
|
Pinging @elastic/es-ui (:ES-UI) |
38 tasks
cjcenizal
added
the
Team:Deployment Management
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This commit changes the
forcemergeaction to also be allowed in thehotphase for policies. Theforcemerge will occur after a rollover, and allows users to take advantage of higher disk speeds for
performing the force merge (on a separate node type, for example).
On caveat with this is that a
forcemergein thehotphase MUST be accompanied by arolloveraction. ILM validates policies to ensure this is the case.
Resolves #43165