Skip ancient closed indices in desired balance #91765
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This assertion fails in the presence of pre-7.2.0 closed indices because such indices don't even have routing table entries. Relates elastic#33888 Closes elastic#91470
DaveCTurner
added
>test
|
Pinging @elastic/es-distributed (Team:Distributed) |
idegtiarenko
approved these changes
Nov 21, 2022
DaveCTurner
added
auto-merge
DaveCTurner
deleted the
2022-11-21-desired-balance-with-ancient-closed-indices
branch
DaveCTurner
added a commit
to DaveCTurner/elasticsearch
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 21, 2022
This assertion fails in the presence of pre-7.2.0 closed indices because such indices don't even have routing table entries. Relates elastic#33888 Closes elastic#91470
elasticsearchmachine
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 21, 2022
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This assertion fails in the presence of pre-7.2.0 closed indices because such indices don't even have routing table entries.
Relates #33888
Closes #91470