Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

TSDB enabled for AWS Redshift #6359

Closed
wants to merge 5 commits into from

Conversation

agithomas
Copy link
Contributor

@agithomas agithomas commented May 30, 2023

  • Enhancement

What does this PR do?

Added TSDB related changes as beta release for AWS redshift package

Checklist

  • I have reviewed tips for building integrations and this pull request is aligned with them.
  • I have verified that all data streams collect metrics or logs.
  • I have added an entry to my package's changelog.yml file.
  • I have verified that Kibana version constraints are current according to guidelines.

@elasticmachine
Copy link

elasticmachine commented May 30, 2023

💚 Build Succeeded

the below badges are clickable and redirect to their specific view in the CI or DOCS
Pipeline View Test View Changes Artifacts preview preview

Expand to view the summary

Build stats

  • Start Time: 2023-06-27T09:57:51.859+0000

  • Duration: 56 min 25 sec

Test stats 🧪

Test Results
Failed 0
Passed 194
Skipped 4
Total 198

🤖 GitHub comments

Expand to view the GitHub comments

To re-run your PR in the CI, just comment with:

  • /test : Re-trigger the build.

@elasticmachine
Copy link

elasticmachine commented May 30, 2023

🌐 Coverage report

Name Metrics % (covered/total) Diff
Packages 100.0% (15/15) 💚
Files 93.75% (15/16) 👎 -6.25
Classes 93.75% (15/16) 👎 -6.25
Methods 85.714% (240/280) 👎 -10.682
Lines 85.925% (7387/8597) 👎 -9.732
Conditionals 100.0% (0/0) 💚

Copy link
Contributor

@ritalwar ritalwar left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@agithomas agithomas marked this pull request as ready for review June 27, 2023 09:38
@agithomas agithomas requested a review from a team as a code owner June 27, 2023 09:38
@botelastic
Copy link

botelastic bot commented Jul 28, 2023

Hi! We just realized that we haven't looked into this PR in a while. We're sorry! We're labeling this issue as Stale to make it hit our filters and make sure we get back to it as soon as possible. In the meantime, it'd be extremely helpful if you could take a look at it as well and confirm its relevance. A simple comment with a nice emoji will be enough :+1. Thank you for your contribution!

@botelastic botelastic bot added the Stalled label Jul 28, 2023
@botelastic
Copy link

botelastic bot commented Aug 27, 2023

Hi! This PR has been stale for a while and we're going to close it as part of our cleanup procedure. We appreciate your contribution and would like to apologize if we have not been able to review it, due to the current heavy load of the team. Feel free to re-open this PR if you think it should stay open and is worth rebasing. Thank you for your contribution!

@botelastic botelastic bot closed this Aug 27, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants