Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[infoblox_nios] - update package spec to 2.9.0 #7057

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 24, 2023
Merged

[infoblox_nios] - update package spec to 2.9.0 #7057

merged 2 commits into from
Jul 24, 2023

Conversation

taylor-swanson
Copy link
Contributor

@taylor-swanson taylor-swanson commented Jul 20, 2023 •
edited
Loading

What does this PR do?

  • Update package spec to 2.9.0
  • Ensure host.ip is an array
[git-generate]
go run github.com/andrewkroh/go-examples/ecs-update@latest -ecs-version=8.8.0 -ecs-git-ref=v8.8.0 -format-version=2.9.0 packages/infoblox_nios

Checklist

  • I have reviewed tips for building integrations and this pull request is aligned with them.
  • I have verified that all data streams collect metrics or logs.
  • I have added an entry to my package's changelog.yml file.
  • I have verified that Kibana version constraints are current according to guidelines.

Related issues

  • Relates elastic/security-team#5870

@taylor-swanson
[infoblox_nios] - update package spec to 2.9.0
2f6e6f7 
- Ensure host.ip is an array

[git-generate]
go run github.com/andrewkroh/go-examples/ecs-update@latest -ecs-version=8.8.0 -ecs-git-ref=v8.8.0 -format-version=2.9.0packages/infoblox_nios
@taylor-swanson taylor-swanson self-assigned this Jul 20, 2023
@elasticmachine
Copy link

elasticmachine commented Jul 20, 2023 •
edited
Loading

💚 Build Succeeded

the below badges are clickable and redirect to their specific view in the CI or DOCS
Pipeline View Test View Changes Artifacts preview preview

Expand to view the summary

Build stats

  • Start Time: 2023-07-20T16:44:25.219+0000

  • Duration: 17 min 0 sec

Test stats 🧪

Test Results
Failed 0
Passed 21
Skipped 0
Total 21

🤖 GitHub comments

Expand to view the GitHub comments

To re-run your PR in the CI, just comment with:

  • /test : Re-trigger the build.

@elasticmachine
Copy link

🌐 Coverage report

Name Metrics % (covered/total) Diff
Packages 100.0% (1/1) 💚
Files 100.0% (4/4) 💚 5.882
Classes 100.0% (4/4) 💚 5.882
Methods 100.0% (37/37) 💚 14.138
Lines 93.568% (611/653) 👍 7.567
Conditionals 100.0% (0/0) 💚

@taylor-swanson taylor-swanson marked this pull request as ready for review July 20, 2023 17:10
@taylor-swanson taylor-swanson requested a review from a team as a code owner July 20, 2023 17:10
@elasticmachine
Copy link

Pinging @elastic/security-external-integrations (Team:Security-External Integrations)

bhapas
bhapas approved these changes Jul 20, 2023
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@bhapas bhapas left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@taylor-swanson taylor-swanson merged commit e48c87b into elastic:main Jul 24, 2023
4 checks passed
@taylor-swanson taylor-swanson deleted the pkg-spec-infoblox_nios branch July 24, 2023 13:15
@elasticmachine
Copy link

Package infoblox_nios - 1.11.0 containing this change is available at https://epr.elastic.co/search?package=infoblox_nios

gizas pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 5, 2023
@taylor-swanson @gizas
[infoblox_nios] - update package spec to 2.9.0 (#7057)
2d50ba7 
- Update package spec to 2.9.0
- Ensure host.ip is an array

[git-generate]
go run github.com/andrewkroh/go-examples/ecs-update@latest -ecs-version=8.8.0 -ecs-git-ref=v8.8.0 -format-version=2.9.0 packages/infoblox_nios
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@bhapas bhapas bhapas approved these changes

Assignees

@taylor-swanson taylor-swanson

Labels
enhancement New feature or request Integration:infoblox_nios Infoblox NIOS
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
3 participants
@taylor-swanson @elasticmachine @bhapas