Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Failing test: Detection Engine - Exception Workflows Integration Tests - Serverless Env - Essentials Tier.x-pack/test/security_solution_api_integration/test_suites/detections_response/detection_engine/exceptions/workflows/basic_license_essentials_tier/rule_exceptions_execution·ts - Detection Engine - Exception workflows APIs @serverless @serverlessQA @ess rule exceptions execution creating rules with exceptions should be able to execute against an exception list that does include valid case sensitive entries and get back 0 alerts #181887

Open
kibanamachine opened this issue Apr 26, 2024 · 3 comments
Labels
blocker failed-test A test failure on a tracked branch, potentially flaky-test skipped-test Team:Detection Engine Security Solution Detection Engine Area v8.15.0

Comments

@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor

kibanamachine commented Apr 26, 2024

A test failed on a tracked branch

JestAssertionError: expect(received).toEqual(expected) // deep equality

Expected: 10
Received: 0
    at Context.<anonymous> (rule_exceptions_execution.ts:204:45)
    at processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:95:5)
    at Object.apply (wrap_function.js:73:16) {
  matcherResult: {
    actual: 0,
    expected: 10,
    message: '\x1B[2mexpect(\x1B[22m\x1B[31mreceived\x1B[39m\x1B[2m).\x1B[22mtoEqual\x1B[2m(\x1B[22m\x1B[32mexpected\x1B[39m\x1B[2m) // deep equality\x1B[22m\n' +
      '\n' +
      'Expected: \x1B[32m10\x1B[39m\n' +
      'Received: \x1B[31m0\x1B[39m',
    name: 'toEqual',
    pass: false
  }
}

First failure: CI Build - main

@kibanamachine kibanamachine added the failed-test A test failure on a tracked branch, potentially flaky-test label Apr 26, 2024
@botelastic botelastic bot added the needs-team Issues missing a team label label Apr 26, 2024
@kibanamachine kibanamachine added the Team:Detection Engine Security Solution Detection Engine Area label Apr 26, 2024
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Contributor

Pinging @elastic/security-detection-engine (Team:Detection Engine)

@botelastic botelastic bot removed the needs-team Issues missing a team label label Apr 26, 2024
@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor Author

New failure: kibana-on-merge - main

@mistic
Copy link
Member

mistic commented May 11, 2024

Skipped.

main: 312f578

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
blocker failed-test A test failure on a tracked branch, potentially flaky-test skipped-test Team:Detection Engine Security Solution Detection Engine Area v8.15.0
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants