Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Failing test: X-Pack Alerting API Integration Tests.x-pack/test/alerting_api_integration/security_and_spaces/group1/tests/alerting/find·ts - alerting api integration security and spaces enabled Alerts - Group 1 alerts find Actions should return the actions correctly #182284

Closed
kibanamachine opened this issue May 1, 2024 · 18 comments · Fixed by #183746
Assignees
Labels
failed-test A test failure on a tracked branch, potentially flaky-test Team:ResponseOps Label for the ResponseOps team (formerly the Cases and Alerting teams)

Comments

@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor

kibanamachine commented May 1, 2024

A test failed on a tracked branch

TypeError: Cannot destructure property 'uuid' of 'action' as it is undefined.
    at Context.<anonymous> (find.ts:629:15)
    at processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:95:5)
    at Object.apply (wrap_function.js:73:16)

First failure: CI Build - main

@kibanamachine kibanamachine added the failed-test A test failure on a tracked branch, potentially flaky-test label May 1, 2024
@botelastic botelastic bot added the needs-team Issues missing a team label label May 1, 2024
@kibanamachine kibanamachine added the Team:ResponseOps Label for the ResponseOps team (formerly the Cases and Alerting teams) label May 1, 2024
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Contributor

Pinging @elastic/response-ops (Team:ResponseOps)

@botelastic botelastic bot removed the needs-team Issues missing a team label label May 1, 2024
@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor Author

New failure: CI Build - main

@jbudz
Copy link
Member

jbudz commented May 1, 2024

/skip

@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor Author

Skipped

main: 24e5b3a

@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor Author

New failure: CI Build - main

@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor Author

New failure: CI Build - main

@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor Author

New failure: CI Build - main

@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor Author

New failure: CI Build - main

@cee-chen
Copy link
Member

cee-chen commented May 1, 2024

This is still failing in main it looks like 👀 #182023 (comment)

@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor Author

New failure: CI Build - main

@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor Author

New failure: CI Build - main

@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor Author

New failure: CI Build - main

@jbudz
Copy link
Member

jbudz commented May 1, 2024

Re-skipped

main: 6f598d5

@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor Author

New failure: CI Build - main

@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor Author

New failure: CI Build - main

@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor Author

New failure: CI Build - main

yuliacech pushed a commit to yuliacech/kibana that referenced this issue May 3, 2024
yuliacech pushed a commit to yuliacech/kibana that referenced this issue May 3, 2024
@mikecote
Copy link
Contributor

mikecote commented May 9, 2024

@cnasikas could this be related to system actions work?

@cnasikas
Copy link
Member

@mikecote Not sure. I will take a look!

@cnasikas cnasikas self-assigned this May 10, 2024
ymao1 added a commit that referenced this issue May 20, 2024
Resolves #182263
Resolves #182284
Resolves #182314

## Summary

Missing `await` in the backfill tests caused a rule created for those
tests not to finish getting deleted before the `find` tests ran

---------

Co-authored-by: Kibana Machine <42973632+kibanamachine@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
failed-test A test failure on a tracked branch, potentially flaky-test Team:ResponseOps Label for the ResponseOps team (formerly the Cases and Alerting teams)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

6 participants