-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[ML] Explain Log Rate Spikes: Fix field candidate selection. #147614
[ML] Explain Log Rate Spikes: Fix field candidate selection. #147614
Conversation
Pinging @elastic/ml-ui (:ml) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Test changes LGTM
💚 Build Succeeded
Metrics [docs]Async chunks
Unknown metric groupsESLint disabled in files
ESLint disabled line counts
Total ESLint disabled count
History
To update your PR or re-run it, just comment with: cc @walterra |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM ⚡
…#147614) The field candidate selection for Explain Log Rate Spikes was missing a check if the supported field type is also aggregatable. For example, a `keyword` type field could still be non-aggregatable if it was both not indexed and `doc_values` set to `false`. Additionally, if no groups were detected, we showed a "Try to continue analysis" button in the UI even if the analysis was able to finish. In this PR the artificial logs dataset for functional tests was extended to include a field like that. (cherry picked from commit aecad27)
💚 All backports created successfully
Note: Successful backport PRs will be merged automatically after passing CI. Questions ?Please refer to the Backport tool documentation |
…147614) (#147792) # Backport This will backport the following commits from `main` to `8.6`: - [[ML] Explain Log Rate Spikes: Fix field candidate selection. (#147614)](#147614) <!--- Backport version: 8.9.7 --> ### Questions ? Please refer to the [Backport tool documentation](https://github.com/sqren/backport) <!--BACKPORT [{"author":{"name":"Walter Rafelsberger","email":"walter.rafelsberger@elastic.co"},"sourceCommit":{"committedDate":"2022-12-19T17:35:31Z","message":"[ML] Explain Log Rate Spikes: Fix field candidate selection. (#147614)\n\nThe field candidate selection for Explain Log Rate Spikes was missing a\r\ncheck if the supported field type is also aggregatable. For example, a\r\n`keyword` type field could still be non-aggregatable if it was both not\r\nindexed and `doc_values` set to `false`. Additionally, if no groups were\r\ndetected, we showed a \"Try to continue analysis\" button in the UI even\r\nif the analysis was able to finish. In this PR the artificial logs dataset for functional tests was extended\r\nto include a field like that.","sha":"aecad27159764d8ea2d0aeddc94fd03954d480e5","branchLabelMapping":{"^v8.7.0$":"main","^v(\\d+).(\\d+).\\d+$":"$1.$2"}},"sourcePullRequest":{"labels":["bug","release_note:fix",":ml","Feature:ML/AIOps","v8.6.0","v8.7.0"],"number":147614,"url":"#147614 Explain Log Rate Spikes: Fix field candidate selection. (#147614)\n\nThe field candidate selection for Explain Log Rate Spikes was missing a\r\ncheck if the supported field type is also aggregatable. For example, a\r\n`keyword` type field could still be non-aggregatable if it was both not\r\nindexed and `doc_values` set to `false`. Additionally, if no groups were\r\ndetected, we showed a \"Try to continue analysis\" button in the UI even\r\nif the analysis was able to finish. In this PR the artificial logs dataset for functional tests was extended\r\nto include a field like that.","sha":"aecad27159764d8ea2d0aeddc94fd03954d480e5"}},"sourceBranch":"main","suggestedTargetBranches":["8.6"],"targetPullRequestStates":[{"branch":"8.6","label":"v8.6.0","labelRegex":"^v(\\d+).(\\d+).\\d+$","isSourceBranch":false,"state":"NOT_CREATED"},{"branch":"main","label":"v8.7.0","labelRegex":"^v8.7.0$","isSourceBranch":true,"state":"MERGED","url":"#147614 Explain Log Rate Spikes: Fix field candidate selection. (#147614)\n\nThe field candidate selection for Explain Log Rate Spikes was missing a\r\ncheck if the supported field type is also aggregatable. For example, a\r\n`keyword` type field could still be non-aggregatable if it was both not\r\nindexed and `doc_values` set to `false`. Additionally, if no groups were\r\ndetected, we showed a \"Try to continue analysis\" button in the UI even\r\nif the analysis was able to finish. In this PR the artificial logs dataset for functional tests was extended\r\nto include a field like that.","sha":"aecad27159764d8ea2d0aeddc94fd03954d480e5"}}]}] BACKPORT--> Co-authored-by: Walter Rafelsberger <walter.rafelsberger@elastic.co>
…#147614) The field candidate selection for Explain Log Rate Spikes was missing a check if the supported field type is also aggregatable. For example, a `keyword` type field could still be non-aggregatable if it was both not indexed and `doc_values` set to `false`. Additionally, if no groups were detected, we showed a "Try to continue analysis" button in the UI even if the analysis was able to finish. In this PR the artificial logs dataset for functional tests was extended to include a field like that.
Summary
Fixes #146992.
The field candidate selection for Explain Log Rate Spikes was missing a check if the supported field type is also aggregatable. For example, a
keyword
type field could still be non-aggregatable if it was both not indexed anddoc_values
set tofalse
. Additionally, if no groups were detected, we showed a "Try to continue analysis" button in the UI even if the analysis was able to finish.In this PR the artificial logs dataset for functional tests was extended to include a field like that. Without the fixes of this PR the outcome in the UI with it looks like this:
With the fix applied to not show the button we get:
Finally, with the additional fix for field selection the whole warning callout disappears:
Checklist