Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Discover] Split saved search plugin v2 #174939

Closed
wants to merge 9 commits into from

Conversation

jughosta
Copy link
Contributor

Summary

This PRs separates "search" SO registration and its migrations into a separate plugin. This package can depend on Lens plugins to call Lens migrations.

Checklist

Delete any items that are not applicable to this PR.

Risk Matrix

Delete this section if it is not applicable to this PR.

Before closing this PR, invite QA, stakeholders, and other developers to identify risks that should be tested prior to the change/feature release.

When forming the risk matrix, consider some of the following examples and how they may potentially impact the change:

Risk Probability Severity Mitigation/Notes
Multiple Spaces—unexpected behavior in non-default Kibana Space. Low High Integration tests will verify that all features are still supported in non-default Kibana Space and when user switches between spaces.
Multiple nodes—Elasticsearch polling might have race conditions when multiple Kibana nodes are polling for the same tasks. High Low Tasks are idempotent, so executing them multiple times will not result in logical error, but will degrade performance. To test for this case we add plenty of unit tests around this logic and document manual testing procedure.
Code should gracefully handle cases when feature X or plugin Y are disabled. Medium High Unit tests will verify that any feature flag or plugin combination still results in our service operational.
See more potential risk examples

For maintainers

@jughosta jughosta added release_note:skip Skip the PR/issue when compiling release notes backport:skip This commit does not require backporting Team:DataDiscovery Discover App Team (Document Explorer, Saved Search, Surrounding documents, Graph) labels Jan 16, 2024
@jughosta jughosta self-assigned this Jan 16, 2024
"server": true,
"browser": false,
"requiredPlugins": ["data"],
"optionalPlugins": ["lens"],
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Kibana starts without errors. Seems to be this circular dependency is resolved.

@jughosta
Copy link
Contributor Author

jughosta commented Feb 8, 2024

/ci

@kibana-ci
Copy link
Collaborator

💛 Build succeeded, but was flaky

Failed CI Steps

Metrics [docs]

Module Count

Fewer modules leads to a faster build time

id before after diff
savedSearch 47 49 +2

Public APIs missing comments

Total count of every public API that lacks a comment. Target amount is 0. Run node scripts/build_api_docs --plugin [yourplugin] --stats comments for more detailed information.

id before after diff
savedSearchSo - 3 +3

Page load bundle

Size of the bundles that are downloaded on every page load. Target size is below 100kb

id before after diff
savedSearch 11.5KB 11.4KB -66.0B
Unknown metric groups

API count

id before after diff
savedSearchSo - 3 +3

ESLint disabled in files

id before after diff
savedSearch 1 0 -1

References to deprecated APIs

id before after diff
savedSearch 9 4 -5
savedSearchSo - 5 +5
total -0

Total ESLint disabled count

id before after diff
savedSearch 3 2 -1

History

To update your PR or re-run it, just comment with:
@elasticmachine merge upstream

cc @jughosta

@jughosta jughosta closed this Mar 4, 2024
jughosta added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 8, 2024
)

- Resolves #167887

## Summary

On Discover page user can see a visualization for data view and ES|QL
modes. For ES|QL mode it's also allowed to customize the visualization.
This PR allows to save such customization together with a saved search.

In more details, various types of Lens visualization can be shown on
Discover page:
- If in the default (data view) mode, Unified Histogram shows a
"formBased" histogram (`type:
UnifiedHistogramSuggestionType.histogramForDataView` in this PR)
- If in the ES|QL mode, 2 scenarios are possible (so far only these are
customizable):
- If Lens has suggestions for the current query, Unified Histogram shows
one of them (`type: UnifiedHistogramSuggestionType.lensSuggestion` in
this PR) Example query: `from kibana_sample_data_logs | stats avg(bytes)
by message.keyword`
- If Lens suggestion list is empty, Unified Histogram shows a
"textBased" histogram (`type:
UnifiedHistogramSuggestionType.histogramForESQL` in this PR). Example
query: `from kibana_sample_data_logs | limit 10`
   
The main flow is that Unified Histogram first picks a suggestion (one of
`UnifiedHistogramSuggestionType` type), then calculates lens attributes
which are necessary to build Lens embeddable. With a saved search we are
saving those calculated lens attributes under `savedSearch.visContext`.
For handling this logic, I refactored `useLensSuggestion`,
`getLensAttributes` into `LensVisService`.

Restoring a saved customization adds complexity to the flow as it should
pick now not just any available suggestion but the suggestion which
matches to the previously saved lens attributes.

Changes to the current query, time range, time field etc can make the
current vis context incompatible and we have to drop the vis
customization. This PR already includes this logic of invalidating the
stored lens attributes if they are not compatible any more. New vis
context will override the previous one when user presses Save for the
current search. Until then, we try to restore the customization from the
previously saved vis context (for example when the query changes back to
the compatible one).


What can invalidate the saved vis context and drop the user's
customization:
- data view id
- data view time field name
- query/filters
- time range if it has a different time interval
- text based columns affect what lens suggestions are available

Flow of creating a new search:

![1](https://github.com/elastic/kibana/assets/1415710/9274d895-cedb-454a-9a9d-3b0cf600d801)

Flow of editing a saved search:

![2](https://github.com/elastic/kibana/assets/1415710/086ce4a0-f679-4d96-892b-631bcfee7ee3)





<details>
<summary>Previous details</summary>

- Previous approach #174373
(saving current suggestion instead of lens attributes)
- Previous approach #174783
(saving lens attributes but it's based on existing hooks)

But I was stuck with how to make "Unsaved changes" badge work well when
user tries to revert changes.

For testing in ES|QL mode I use `from kibana_sample_data_logs | limit
10` as query, customize color of a lens histogram, and save it with a
saved search. Next I check 2 cases:
1. edit query limit `from kibana_sample_data_logs | limit 100`, see that
vis customization gets reset which is expected, press "Revert changes"
in the "Unsaved changes" badge => notice that reset did not work
2. edit only histogram color, press "Revert changes" in the "Unsaved
changes" badge => notice that reset did not work

Here are some nuances with the state management I am seeing which
together do not allow to successfully revert unsaved changes:
- For ES|QL histogram lens attributes include a modified query `from
kibana_sample_data_logs | limit 10 | EVAL timestamp=DATE_TRUNC(30
second, @timestamp) | stats results = count(*) by timestamp | rename
timestamp as "@timestamp every 30 second"` which means that not only
changes to the original query but also a different time interval
invalidates the saved lens attributes.
- In ES|QL mode, `query` prop update is delayed for
`UnifiedHistogramContainer` component until Discover finishes the
documents fetch
https://github.com/elastic/kibana/blob/fc2ec957fe78900967da26c80817aea8a0bd2c65/src/plugins/discover/public/application/main/components/layout/use_discover_histogram.ts#L346
which means that Discover should make a request on revert changes. And
It's not happening for (2) as it does not make sense for Discover to
trigger refetch if only `visContext` changes so we should find another
way. With (1) there is another problem that Discover `visContext` state
gets hijacked by lens attributes invalidation logic (as query is not
sync yet to UnifiedHistogram) before fetch is completed or get [a chance
to be
fired](https://github.com/elastic/kibana/blob/6038f92b1fcaeedf635a0eab68fd9cdadd1103d3/src/plugins/discover/public/application/main/hooks/utils/build_state_subscribe.ts#L51-L54).
I tried delaying `externalVisContext` prop update too (to keep in sync
with `query` update) but it does not help
https://github.com/elastic/kibana/blob/fc2ec957fe78900967da26c80817aea8a0bd2c65/src/plugins/discover/public/application/main/components/layout/use_discover_histogram.ts#L437
- Unified Histogram should signal to Discover to start a refetch when
current suggestion changes
https://github.com/elastic/kibana/blob/fc2ec957fe78900967da26c80817aea8a0bd2c65/src/plugins/discover/public/application/main/components/layout/use_discover_histogram.ts#L289
- for some reason this logic is required for "Revert changes" to work as
it triggers the refetch. I would expect Discover on its own to notice
the change in query and refetch data but it does not seem to be the
case.

</details>

<details>
<summary>Other challenges</summary>

- [ ] Since we are starting to save lens attributes inside a saved
search object (similar to how Dashboard saves lens vis by value), we
should integrate Lens migrations into saved search migrations logic. I
made a quick PoC how it could look like here
jughosta@4529711
This showed that adding Lens plugin as a dependency to saved search
plugin causes lots of circular deps in Kibana. To resolve that I am
suggesting to spit saved search plugin into 2 plugins
#174939 - not the best solution
but it seems impossible to split lens plugins instead.
    Updates here: 
- [x] revert the code regarding migrations and saved search plugin split
- [x] create a github issue to handle client side migrations once their
API is available #179151
- [x] Discover syncs app state with URL which means that the new
`visContext` (large lens attributes object) ends up in the URL too. We
should exclude `visContext` from URL sync as it can make the URL too
long.
    Updates here:  we are not using appState for this any more
- [x] Changes from #171081 would
need to be refactored and integrated into the new `LensVisService`.
- [x]  Refactor after #177790
- [x] Handle a case when no chart is available for current ES|QL query
- [ ] For ES|QL histogram lens attributes include a modified query `from
kibana_sample_data_logs | limit 10 | EVAL timestamp=DATE_TRUNC(30
second, @timestamp) | stats results = count(*) by timestamp | rename
timestamp as "@timestamp every 30 second"` which means that not only
changes to the original query but also a different time range can reset
the customization of lens vis as it gets a different time interval based
on current time range
- New update from Stratoula: 
- [ ] would it help to persist response of `onApplyCb` instead of lens
attributes? <= the shape does not seem to be different and it works as
it is so I'm keeping lens attributes
- [x] use new `getLensAttributes` from
#174677

</details>

10x flaky test
https://buildkite.com/elastic/kibana-flaky-test-suite-runner/builds/5578

### Checklist

- [x] [Unit or functional
tests](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/kibana/master/development-tests.html)
were updated or added to match the most common scenarios
- [x] [Flaky Test
Runner](https://ci-stats.kibana.dev/trigger_flaky_test_runner/1) was
used on any tests changed
- [x] This was checked for [cross-browser
compatibility](https://www.elastic.co/support/matrix#matrix_browsers)

---------

Co-authored-by: kibanamachine <42973632+kibanamachine@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Matthias Wilhelm <matthias.wilhelm@elastic.co>
Co-authored-by: Stratoula Kalafateli <efstratia.kalafateli@elastic.co>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport:skip This commit does not require backporting release_note:skip Skip the PR/issue when compiling release notes Team:DataDiscovery Discover App Team (Document Explorer, Saved Search, Surrounding documents, Graph)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants