Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ci] Split quick checks out of checks #175319

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 23, 2024
Merged

Conversation

jbudz
Copy link
Member

@jbudz jbudz commented Jan 23, 2024

Quick Checks will used as a blocking step before tests are run. We want to shorten the runtime to keep pipeline runtimes down, so this splits out longer running and less relevant checks into two steps, Checks and Quick Checks

@jbudz jbudz marked this pull request as ready for review January 23, 2024 15:21
@jbudz jbudz requested a review from a team as a code owner January 23, 2024 15:21
@jbudz
Copy link
Member Author

jbudz commented Jan 23, 2024

buildkite test this

@jbudz jbudz added Team:Operations Team label for Operations Team release_note:skip Skip the PR/issue when compiling release notes labels Jan 23, 2024
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Contributor

Pinging @elastic/kibana-operations (Team:Operations)

@jbudz jbudz added the backport:prev-minor Backport to the previous minor version (i.e. one version back from main) label Jan 23, 2024
@kibana-ci
Copy link
Collaborator

💛 Build succeeded, but was flaky

Failed CI Steps

Metrics [docs]

✅ unchanged

To update your PR or re-run it, just comment with:
@elasticmachine merge upstream

@jbudz jbudz merged commit 68d1bac into elastic:main Jan 23, 2024
25 checks passed
kibanamachine pushed a commit to kibanamachine/kibana that referenced this pull request Jan 23, 2024
`Quick Checks` will used as a blocking step before tests are run. We
want to shorten the runtime to keep pipeline runtimes down, so this
splits out longer running and less relevant checks into two steps,
`Checks` and `Quick Checks`

(cherry picked from commit 68d1bac)
@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor

💚 All backports created successfully

Status Branch Result
8.12

Note: Successful backport PRs will be merged automatically after passing CI.

Questions ?

Please refer to the Backport tool documentation

@kibanamachine kibanamachine added the backport missing Added to PRs automatically when the are determined to be missing a backport. label Jan 24, 2024
@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor

Looks like this PR has a backport PR but it still hasn't been merged. Please merge it ASAP to keep the branches relatively in sync.

kibanamachine added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 24, 2024
# Backport

This will backport the following commits from `main` to `8.12`:
- [[ci] Split quick checks out of checks
(#175319)](#175319)

<!--- Backport version: 9.4.3 -->

### Questions ?
Please refer to the [Backport tool
documentation](https://github.com/sqren/backport)

<!--BACKPORT
[{"author":{"name":"Jon","email":"jon@elastic.co"},"sourceCommit":{"committedDate":"2024-01-23T19:06:52Z","message":"[ci]
Split quick checks out of checks (#175319)\n\n`Quick Checks` will used
as a blocking step before tests are run. We\r\nwant to shorten the
runtime to keep pipeline runtimes down, so this\r\nsplits out longer
running and less relevant checks into two steps,\r\n`Checks` and `Quick
Checks`","sha":"68d1bac8b8e909f05b0bcec97fb653ad0bc367e7","branchLabelMapping":{"^v8.13.0$":"main","^v(\\d+).(\\d+).\\d+$":"$1.$2"}},"sourcePullRequest":{"labels":["Team:Operations","release_note:skip","backport:prev-minor","v8.13.0"],"title":"[ci]
Split quick checks out of
checks","number":175319,"url":"#175319
Split quick checks out of checks (#175319)\n\n`Quick Checks` will used
as a blocking step before tests are run. We\r\nwant to shorten the
runtime to keep pipeline runtimes down, so this\r\nsplits out longer
running and less relevant checks into two steps,\r\n`Checks` and `Quick
Checks`","sha":"68d1bac8b8e909f05b0bcec97fb653ad0bc367e7"}},"sourceBranch":"main","suggestedTargetBranches":[],"targetPullRequestStates":[{"branch":"main","label":"v8.13.0","branchLabelMappingKey":"^v8.13.0$","isSourceBranch":true,"state":"MERGED","url":"#175319
Split quick checks out of checks (#175319)\n\n`Quick Checks` will used
as a blocking step before tests are run. We\r\nwant to shorten the
runtime to keep pipeline runtimes down, so this\r\nsplits out longer
running and less relevant checks into two steps,\r\n`Checks` and `Quick
Checks`","sha":"68d1bac8b8e909f05b0bcec97fb653ad0bc367e7"}}]}]
BACKPORT-->

Co-authored-by: Jon <jon@elastic.co>
@kibanamachine kibanamachine added v8.12.1 and removed backport missing Added to PRs automatically when the are determined to be missing a backport. labels Jan 24, 2024
lcawl pushed a commit to lcawl/kibana that referenced this pull request Jan 26, 2024
`Quick Checks` will used as a blocking step before tests are run. We
want to shorten the runtime to keep pipeline runtimes down, so this
splits out longer running and less relevant checks into two steps,
`Checks` and `Quick Checks`
CoenWarmer pushed a commit to CoenWarmer/kibana that referenced this pull request Feb 15, 2024
`Quick Checks` will used as a blocking step before tests are run. We
want to shorten the runtime to keep pipeline runtimes down, so this
splits out longer running and less relevant checks into two steps,
`Checks` and `Quick Checks`
CoenWarmer pushed a commit to CoenWarmer/kibana that referenced this pull request Feb 15, 2024
`Quick Checks` will used as a blocking step before tests are run. We
want to shorten the runtime to keep pipeline runtimes down, so this
splits out longer running and less relevant checks into two steps,
`Checks` and `Quick Checks`
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport:prev-minor Backport to the previous minor version (i.e. one version back from main) release_note:skip Skip the PR/issue when compiling release notes Team:Operations Team label for Operations Team v8.12.1 v8.13.0
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants