Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Security Solutions][Detection Engine] Changes DELETE to POST for _bulk_delete to avoid potential incompatibility issues #87914

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Jan 15, 2021

Conversation

FrankHassanabad
Copy link
Contributor

@FrankHassanabad FrankHassanabad commented Jan 11, 2021

Summary

Changes DELETE to POST for _bulk_delete on the client only for a variety of reasons.

According to the RFC, not all servers and proxies need to honor DELETE having a body. From: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7231

A payload within a DELETE request message has no defined semantics;
sending a payload body on a DELETE request might cause some existing
implementations to reject the request.

Within at least one proxy, h2o2, we have found that it does indeed change request headers which will cause NodeJS to not attach the body of a DELETE:
hapijs/h2o2#124

Also from other communities such as OpenAPI where they debated this, they allow it but discourage it for reasons outlined there that I will not repeat here:
OAI/OpenAPI-Specification#1937

Elastic Search API's and other Kibana API's use POST rather than DELETE for their bodies that are attached to DELETE:
https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/current/docs-delete-by-query.html

We still support bodies in DELETE and POST but are just changing the web client to utilize POST moving forward.

Checklist

Reviewed and we already have unit tests and end to end tests for these use cases so we are good with just updating them.

@FrankHassanabad FrankHassanabad self-assigned this Jan 12, 2021
@FrankHassanabad FrankHassanabad added Feature:Detection Rules Anything related to Security Solution's Detection Rules Team:Detections and Resp Security Detection Response Team v8.0.0 v7.12.0 release_note:fix and removed Feature:Detection Rules Anything related to Security Solution's Detection Rules labels Jan 12, 2021
@FrankHassanabad FrankHassanabad changed the title Change DELETE to POST for _bulk_delete to avoid incompatibility issues [Security Solutions][Detection Engine] Changes DELETE to POST for _bulk_delete to avoid potential incompatibility issues Jan 12, 2021
@FrankHassanabad FrankHassanabad marked this pull request as ready for review January 12, 2021 18:00
@FrankHassanabad FrankHassanabad requested review from a team as code owners January 12, 2021 18:00
@spong
Copy link
Member

spong commented Jan 14, 2021

@elasticmachine merge upstream

@spong spong added docs release_note:plugin_api_changes Contains a Plugin API changes section for the breaking plugin API changes section. labels Jan 14, 2021
@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor

💚 Build Succeeded

Metrics [docs]

Async chunks

Total size of all lazy-loaded chunks that will be downloaded as the user navigates the app

id before after diff
securitySolution 8.5MB 8.5MB -2.0B

History

To update your PR or re-run it, just comment with:
@elasticmachine merge upstream

@FrankHassanabad FrankHassanabad removed release_note:plugin_api_changes Contains a Plugin API changes section for the breaking plugin API changes section. docs labels Jan 15, 2021
Copy link
Contributor

@yctercero yctercero left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM - thanks for all the context in the description!

Copy link
Contributor

@banderror banderror left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I also really appreciate the description, thank you 👍

@FrankHassanabad FrankHassanabad merged commit 2e28683 into elastic:master Jan 15, 2021
@FrankHassanabad FrankHassanabad deleted the change-delete-to-post branch January 15, 2021 18:45
FrankHassanabad added a commit to FrankHassanabad/kibana that referenced this pull request Jan 15, 2021
elastic#87914)

## Summary

Changes `DELETE` to `POST` for _bulk_delete on the client only for a variety of reasons.

According to the RFC, not all servers and proxies need to honor DELETE having a body. From: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7231

```
A payload within a DELETE request message has no defined semantics;
sending a payload body on a DELETE request might cause some existing
implementations to reject the request.
```

Within at least one proxy, h2o2, we have found that it does indeed change request headers which will cause NodeJS to not attach the body of a `DELETE`:
hapijs/h2o2#124

Also from other communities such as OpenAPI where they debated this, they allow it but discourage it for reasons outlined there that I will not repeat here:
OAI/OpenAPI-Specification#1937

Elastic Search API's and other Kibana API's use `POST` rather than `DELETE` for their bodies that are attached to `DELETE`:
https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/current/docs-delete-by-query.html

We still support bodies in `DELETE` and `POST` but are just changing the web client to utilize `POST` moving forward.


### Checklist

Reviewed and we already have unit tests and end to end tests for these use cases so we are good with just updating them. 

- [x] [Unit or functional tests](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/kibana/master/development-tests.html) were updated or added to match the most common scenarios
FrankHassanabad added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 15, 2021
#87914) (#88509)

## Summary

Changes `DELETE` to `POST` for _bulk_delete on the client only for a variety of reasons.

According to the RFC, not all servers and proxies need to honor DELETE having a body. From: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7231

```
A payload within a DELETE request message has no defined semantics;
sending a payload body on a DELETE request might cause some existing
implementations to reject the request.
```

Within at least one proxy, h2o2, we have found that it does indeed change request headers which will cause NodeJS to not attach the body of a `DELETE`:
hapijs/h2o2#124

Also from other communities such as OpenAPI where they debated this, they allow it but discourage it for reasons outlined there that I will not repeat here:
OAI/OpenAPI-Specification#1937

Elastic Search API's and other Kibana API's use `POST` rather than `DELETE` for their bodies that are attached to `DELETE`:
https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/current/docs-delete-by-query.html

We still support bodies in `DELETE` and `POST` but are just changing the web client to utilize `POST` moving forward.


### Checklist

Reviewed and we already have unit tests and end to end tests for these use cases so we are good with just updating them. 

- [x] [Unit or functional tests](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/kibana/master/development-tests.html) were updated or added to match the most common scenarios
gmmorris added a commit to gmmorris/kibana that referenced this pull request Jan 18, 2021
* master: (33 commits)
  [Security Solution][Case] Fix patch cases integration test with alerts (elastic#88311)
  [Security Solutions][Detection Engine] Removes duplicate API calls (elastic#88420)
  Fix log msg (elastic#88370)
  [Test] Add tag cloud visualization to dashboard in functional test for reporting (elastic#87600)
  removing kibana-core-ui from codeowners (elastic#88111)
  [Alerting] Migrate Event Log plugin to TS project references (elastic#81557)
  [Maps] fix zooming while drawing shape filter logs errors in console (elastic#88413)
  Porting fixes 1 (elastic#88477)
  [APM] Explicitly set environment for cross-service links (elastic#87481)
  chore(NA): remove mocha junit ci integrations (elastic#88129)
  [APM] Only display relevant sections for rum agent in service overview (elastic#88410)
  [Enterprise Search] Automatically mock shared logic files (elastic#88494)
  [APM] Disable Create custom link button on Transaction details page for read-only users
  [Docs] clean-up vega map reference documenation (elastic#88487)
  [Security Solution] Fix Timeline event details layout (elastic#88377)
  Change DELETE to POST for _bulk_delete to avoid incompatibility issues (elastic#87914)
  [Monitoring] Change cloud messaging on no data page (elastic#88375)
  [Uptime] clear ping state when PingList component in unmounted (elastic#88321)
  [APM] Consistent terminology for latency and throughput (elastic#88452)
  fix copy (elastic#88481)
  ...
JasonStoltz pushed a commit to JasonStoltz/kibana that referenced this pull request Jan 19, 2021
elastic#87914)

## Summary

Changes `DELETE` to `POST` for _bulk_delete on the client only for a variety of reasons.

According to the RFC, not all servers and proxies need to honor DELETE having a body. From: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7231

```
A payload within a DELETE request message has no defined semantics;
sending a payload body on a DELETE request might cause some existing
implementations to reject the request.
```

Within at least one proxy, h2o2, we have found that it does indeed change request headers which will cause NodeJS to not attach the body of a `DELETE`:
hapijs/h2o2#124

Also from other communities such as OpenAPI where they debated this, they allow it but discourage it for reasons outlined there that I will not repeat here:
OAI/OpenAPI-Specification#1937

Elastic Search API's and other Kibana API's use `POST` rather than `DELETE` for their bodies that are attached to `DELETE`:
https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/current/docs-delete-by-query.html

We still support bodies in `DELETE` and `POST` but are just changing the web client to utilize `POST` moving forward.


### Checklist

Reviewed and we already have unit tests and end to end tests for these use cases so we are good with just updating them. 

- [x] [Unit or functional tests](https://www.elastic.co/guide/en/kibana/master/development-tests.html) were updated or added to match the most common scenarios
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants