Allow control over if we load settings from System Properties when using TransportClient. #2312
Conversation
the TransportClient.
|
Here is a link to some more discussion over this topic in the google group : https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!topic/elasticsearch/jRxu0ZzaKo8 |
|
Hello All - any idea when this fix might make it in a release? Just a general timeline would be helpful. I need to figure out how/when to move this fix into production. It will either mean building a custom jar with the latest fully released codebase or waiting for this fix to make it in. Thanks for the great product! |
|
@kimchy Hey Shay, any way I could get a timeline on when we could expect this "fix" to be in a release? I don't want o give my client a custom jar and then they update it and it breaks their stuff because this isn't in it. Please advise. Thanks! |
|
@imotov Hey Igor, is there any way to get an update as to how long this update might take to make it in trunk - or a release? I was hoping it could be in trunk before December, but that is looking unlikely. If there is anything you need from me please let me know. |
|
After testing the latest release of ES, I have found that the setting provided does work as expected. However, it looks like the property is config.ignore_system_properties Thanks a million guys! |
I had problems when trying to use the TransportClient inside a java application plugin - that now uses an internal ES node. They are setting all the ES settings via the System Properties, so my settings get overridden. I am now just allowing a bit more control over how the settings get loaded.