Make aliases affect both-prefixed and safe-prefixed declarations #296
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This was referenced Apr 8, 2024
elchininet
force-pushed
the
make_aliases_affect_safe_prefixed_rules
branch
from
3d65799
to
ffa7bad
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This pull request makes aliases being taken into account for both-prefixed and safe-prefixed declarations. In this way if a declaration needs to be moved to a prefixed rule with the
bothPrefix, either because it can be overriden or because thesafeBothPrefixrule is set, it will do the same with an alias of such a declaration.