Split US into Balancing Authorities #2301
Conversation
|
@fbarl Ideally I would also like it to show the 'true' (larger) balancing authority area when hovering over the zone, Is this possible/easy? It looked to me like modifying web.js might do it, but I am not so familiar with the frontend. |
| 'US-NY->US-PJM': 'EBA.NYIS-PJM.ID.H', | ||
|
|
||
| #Exchanges to non-US BAs | ||
| 'US-CAL-CISO->MX-BC': 'EBA.CISO-CFE.ID.H', #Unable to verify if MX-BC is correct |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
given the comment, is there any action item here? Something we should check before merging?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I tried to find more information on which Mexican BAs had exchanges, but was unable to find it on the Mexico side. Since we don't have any mexican production data at this point, I don't think this will affect anything yet, this is more a note for the future, if we find a source for mexican data we should check these exchanges too.
|
wait do we have the US zones ready??!?! |
|
Seems like there is an error in mapping CAISO in CA, USA. Half of northern CA is included in WAPA, When I believe it is part of CAISO. |
* Initial commit * Added zones to zonesjson * Added exchanges * Added bounding boxes
solves #143 (Hopefully!)
This PR uses two sets of geojsons:
The original shape data was obtained from https://hifld-geoplatform.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/control-areas
Example 'look' (the carbon intensities values were chosen at random here, just to illustrate how it could look, they are not at all related to the true US carbon intensities):
Some still TBD items:
TBD after contrib implementation: