Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: security: improve IPC validation in guest-view-manager #16252

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 5, 2019

Conversation

miniak
Copy link
Contributor

@miniak miniak commented Jan 3, 2019

Description of Change

Checklist

  • PR description included and stakeholders cc'd
  • npm test passes
  • PR title follows semantic commit guidelines

Release Notes

Notes: no-notes

@miniak miniak added the wip ⚒ label Jan 3, 2019
@miniak miniak requested a review from a team January 3, 2019 18:32
@miniak miniak self-assigned this Jan 3, 2019
@miniak miniak changed the title [wip] security: improve IPC validation in guest-view-manager security: improve IPC validation in guest-view-manager Jan 3, 2019
@miniak miniak removed the wip ⚒ label Jan 3, 2019
@miniak
Copy link
Contributor Author

miniak commented Jan 3, 2019

@zcbenz can you please review?

Copy link
Member

@ppontes ppontes left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

lib/browser/guest-view-manager.js Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@miniak miniak changed the title security: improve IPC validation in guest-view-manager fix: security: improve IPC validation in guest-view-manager Jan 5, 2019
@nornagon nornagon merged commit 959c7a7 into master Jan 5, 2019
@release-clerk
Copy link

release-clerk bot commented Jan 5, 2019

No Release Notes

@trop
Copy link
Contributor

trop bot commented Jan 5, 2019

I have automatically backported this PR to "4-0-x", please check out #16283

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants