Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

browser: make destruction of webContents async #9113

Merged
merged 6 commits into from May 1, 2017
Merged

Conversation

deepak1556
Copy link
Member

@deepak1556 deepak1556 commented Apr 5, 2017

// FIXME: Multiple Emit calls inside an observer assume that object
// will be alive till end of the observer. Synchronous `destroy` api
// violates this contract and crashes.
// { name: 'did-frame-finish-load', url: `${server.url}/200` },
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@zcbenz currently we have in api_web_contents.cc the following:

void WebContents::DidFinishLoad(content::RenderFrameHost* render_frame_host,
                                const GURL& validated_url) {
  bool is_main_frame = !render_frame_host->GetParent();
  Emit("did-frame-finish-load", is_main_frame);

  if (is_main_frame)
    Emit("did-finish-load");
}

calling webContents.destroy inside did-frame-finish-load will lead to a crash when did-finish-load is invoked with

[2853:0404/235125.714735:FATAL:wrappable.cc(24)] Check failed: !wrapper_.IsEmpty(). 
#0 0x7fe05839616e base::debug::StackTrace::StackTrace()
#1 0x7fe0583b2eab logging::LogMessage::~LogMessage()
#2 0x000000b8d723 mate::WrappableBase::GetWrapper()
#3 0x000000c782e5 mate::EventEmitter<>::GetWrapper()
#4 0x000000c7b1f9 _ZN4mate12EventEmitterIN4atom3api11WebContentsEE14EmitWithSenderIJEEEbRKN4base16BasicStringPieceISsEEPN7content11WebContentsEPN3IPC7MessageEDpRKT_
#5 0x000000c71bf4 _ZN4mate12EventEmitterIN4atom3api11WebContentsEE4EmitIJEEEbRKN4base16BasicStringPieceISsEEDpRKT_
#6 0x000000c6761a atom::api::WebContents::DidFinishLoad()
#7 0x7fe05c397999 content::WebContentsImpl::OnDidFinishLoad()
#8 0x7fe05c39777e <unknown>
#9 0x7fe05c3963fc content::WebContentsImpl::OnMessageReceived()
#10 0x7fe05c121888 content::RenderFrameHostImpl::OnMessageReceived()
#11 0x7fe057edeac5 IPC::ChannelProxy::Context::OnDispatchMessage()
#12 0x7fe058396cee base::debug::TaskAnnotator::RunTask()
#13 0x7fe0583bba1c base::MessageLoop::RunTask()
#14 0x7fe0583bbd38 base::MessageLoop::DeferOrRunPendingTask()
#15 0x7fe0583bc0fb base::MessageLoop::DoWork()
#16 0x7fe0583be4aa <unknown>
#17 0x7fe0499835a7 g_main_context_dispatch
#18 0x7fe049983810 <unknown>
#19 0x7fe0499838bc g_main_context_iteration
#20 0x7fe0583be316 base::MessagePumpGlib::Run()
#21 0x7fe0583bb7b7 base::MessageLoop::RunHandler()
#22 0x7fe0583e52b0 base::RunLoop::Run()
#23 0x7fe05c03bab8 content::BrowserMainLoop::MainMessageLoopRun()
#24 0x7fe05c03b905 content::BrowserMainLoop::RunMainMessageLoopParts()
#25 0x7fe05c03e94d <unknown>
#26 0x7fe05c03743e content::BrowserMain()
#27 0x7fe05c6db094 <unknown>
#28 0x7fe05c6d9ba0 content::ContentMain()
#29 0x000000aa569a main
#30 0x7fe047ae9511 __libc_start_main
#31 0x000000aa54e5 <unknown>

I can think of two ways to fix this:

  • Make destroy async by default deepak1556/native-mate@c98d5d6 , will have to rewire cases inside the code base to follow this behavior, especially webview since we need to make sure they are destroyed before any host webContents.

  • Return empty wrapper when its destroyed and check if object is available before emitting events.

What can be the best approach to fix this scenario ?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I prefer the second way, making destroy async feels scary.

Copy link
Member

@zcbenz zcbenz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This change looks good to me.

The destruction of WebContents is getting too complicated since we have too many ways to destroy a WebContents under different cases, we should find a way to simplify it in future.

@zcbenz zcbenz merged commit 9e0c308 into master May 1, 2017
@zcbenz zcbenz deleted the window_close_patch branch May 1, 2017 08:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants