New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
browser: make destruction of webContents async #9113
Conversation
// FIXME: Multiple Emit calls inside an observer assume that object | ||
// will be alive till end of the observer. Synchronous `destroy` api | ||
// violates this contract and crashes. | ||
// { name: 'did-frame-finish-load', url: `${server.url}/200` }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@zcbenz currently we have in api_web_contents.cc
the following:
void WebContents::DidFinishLoad(content::RenderFrameHost* render_frame_host,
const GURL& validated_url) {
bool is_main_frame = !render_frame_host->GetParent();
Emit("did-frame-finish-load", is_main_frame);
if (is_main_frame)
Emit("did-finish-load");
}
calling webContents.destroy
inside did-frame-finish-load
will lead to a crash when did-finish-load
is invoked with
[2853:0404/235125.714735:FATAL:wrappable.cc(24)] Check failed: !wrapper_.IsEmpty().
#0 0x7fe05839616e base::debug::StackTrace::StackTrace()
#1 0x7fe0583b2eab logging::LogMessage::~LogMessage()
#2 0x000000b8d723 mate::WrappableBase::GetWrapper()
#3 0x000000c782e5 mate::EventEmitter<>::GetWrapper()
#4 0x000000c7b1f9 _ZN4mate12EventEmitterIN4atom3api11WebContentsEE14EmitWithSenderIJEEEbRKN4base16BasicStringPieceISsEEPN7content11WebContentsEPN3IPC7MessageEDpRKT_
#5 0x000000c71bf4 _ZN4mate12EventEmitterIN4atom3api11WebContentsEE4EmitIJEEEbRKN4base16BasicStringPieceISsEEDpRKT_
#6 0x000000c6761a atom::api::WebContents::DidFinishLoad()
#7 0x7fe05c397999 content::WebContentsImpl::OnDidFinishLoad()
#8 0x7fe05c39777e <unknown>
#9 0x7fe05c3963fc content::WebContentsImpl::OnMessageReceived()
#10 0x7fe05c121888 content::RenderFrameHostImpl::OnMessageReceived()
#11 0x7fe057edeac5 IPC::ChannelProxy::Context::OnDispatchMessage()
#12 0x7fe058396cee base::debug::TaskAnnotator::RunTask()
#13 0x7fe0583bba1c base::MessageLoop::RunTask()
#14 0x7fe0583bbd38 base::MessageLoop::DeferOrRunPendingTask()
#15 0x7fe0583bc0fb base::MessageLoop::DoWork()
#16 0x7fe0583be4aa <unknown>
#17 0x7fe0499835a7 g_main_context_dispatch
#18 0x7fe049983810 <unknown>
#19 0x7fe0499838bc g_main_context_iteration
#20 0x7fe0583be316 base::MessagePumpGlib::Run()
#21 0x7fe0583bb7b7 base::MessageLoop::RunHandler()
#22 0x7fe0583e52b0 base::RunLoop::Run()
#23 0x7fe05c03bab8 content::BrowserMainLoop::MainMessageLoopRun()
#24 0x7fe05c03b905 content::BrowserMainLoop::RunMainMessageLoopParts()
#25 0x7fe05c03e94d <unknown>
#26 0x7fe05c03743e content::BrowserMain()
#27 0x7fe05c6db094 <unknown>
#28 0x7fe05c6d9ba0 content::ContentMain()
#29 0x000000aa569a main
#30 0x7fe047ae9511 __libc_start_main
#31 0x000000aa54e5 <unknown>
I can think of two ways to fix this:
-
Make
destroy
async by default deepak1556/native-mate@c98d5d6 , will have to rewire cases inside the code base to follow this behavior, especially webview since we need to make sure they are destroyed before any host webContents. -
Return empty wrapper when its destroyed and check if object is available before emitting events.
What can be the best approach to fix this scenario ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I prefer the second way, making destroy
async feels scary.
3705677
to
ebdc731
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This change looks good to me.
The destruction of WebContents
is getting too complicated since we have too many ways to destroy a WebContents
under different cases, we should find a way to simplify it in future.
Fixes #8930
Fixes #9230
Original discussion https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msg/embedder-dev/XTv6SpambTI/V51xPz1hFgAJ