Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
chore: Add meeting notes for Releases WG (#63)
- Loading branch information
Showing
1 changed file
with
41 additions
and
0 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@ | ||
# Release WG Minutes | ||
|
||
### Date: 2019-03-27 | ||
|
||
## Attendees | ||
|
||
**Members** | ||
- @BinaryMuse | ||
- @MarshallOfSound | ||
- @ckerr | ||
- @sofianguy | ||
- @jkleinsc | ||
|
||
**Visitors** | ||
- @nitish | ||
|
||
|
||
## Agenda | ||
* Deprecating native arm mksnapshot (@jkleinsc) | ||
* from Upgrades WG, decision was made to deprecate because it is broken on M74. | ||
* will add note when 5.0.0 goes stable | ||
* 6.0.0 Release schedule (@sofianguy) | ||
* postpone to next week | ||
* Rebasing Node in 5.0 beta. Discussion: [1](https://github.com/electron/node/pull/98#issue-264905618), [2](https://github.com/electron/electron/issues/17309#issuecomment-477126169) (issue raised by @zcbenz, added to agenda by @ckerr) | ||
* **RESOLVED**: We'll be going with the Node rebase instead of using these PRs. This has been discussed in Upgrades WG (but maybe not in Releases WG until now?). | ||
* follow-up from last week's decision for 12 week release cadence -- would we still support latest 3 versions? Or more? (@sofianguy) | ||
* @jkleinsc raised the point in last week's discussion -- would we need to support more versions because of the higher release velocity? @MarshallOfSound and @jkleinsc both remember the decision being "No" -- meaning the support life of a release would be about 36 weeks. | ||
* The new release cadence would affect the companies doing beta testing. @sofianguy thinks we would have to prioritize the latest beta bugs on top of the latest major stable bugs. | ||
* For example we release 6.0 beta, we would prioritize those bugs _and_ the 5.0 stable bugs that were affecting AFP members. | ||
* The reason is companies are not going to release fast enough for a single cycle. | ||
|
||
## Action Items | ||
- [ ] @nitsakh will contact @zcbenz about the Node rebase and those two PRs listed in the agenda above | ||
|
||
## Follow-Up Discussion | ||
* 6.0.0 Release schedule (@sofianguy) | ||
|
||
|
||
## Backport Requests | ||
|
||
**Nota Bene:** If you are the requester, you are generally expected to attend the meeting. If you are unable to do so, please state your reason for requesting the backport. |