CI: unbreak fedora #264
Merged
CI: unbreak fedora #264
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
We build granite7 because that is not in fedora repositories, but since this plug hasn't ported to gtk4 yet there should be no reason to break CI due to this. With the same reason there should be no need to install libadwaita right now.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
We build granite7 because that is not in fedora repositories, but since this plug hasn't ported to gtk4 yet there should be no reason to break CI due to this (though the case here is simple as missing sassc).
With the same reason there should be no need to install libadwaita right now.
(We will have to revisit this file anyway when we port things to gtk4 I assume, since the switchboard version is hardcoded to 6.0.2)