Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: add support for path parameters #44

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 10, 2023
Merged

feat: add support for path parameters #44

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 10, 2023

Conversation

LakiG
Copy link
Collaborator

@LakiG LakiG commented Apr 9, 2023

Fixes #42

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 9, 2023

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 100.00% and no project coverage change.

Comparison is base (250e1f4) 99.70% compared to head (3e75a30) 99.71%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##              dev      #44   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.70%   99.71%           
=======================================
  Files          11       11           
  Lines         689      699   +10     
=======================================
+ Hits          687      697   +10     
  Misses          2        2           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
compliance_suite/functions/client.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
compliance_suite/test_runner.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@LakiG LakiG requested a review from uniqueg April 9, 2023 19:22
Copy link
Member

@uniqueg uniqueg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM in principle, but I don't understand why the tests are in this PR

@LakiG
Copy link
Collaborator Author

LakiG commented Apr 10, 2023

No new tests have been added. The old tests which had the path parameters in them were modified with this new feature.

I removed the TES code and made path parameters part generic as well.

@uniqueg
Copy link
Member

uniqueg commented Apr 10, 2023

Okay, then. Probably shouldn't have looked at it after my third beer 😅

@uniqueg uniqueg changed the title feat: add path parameters feat: add support for path parameters Apr 10, 2023
@LakiG LakiG merged commit 9b47217 into dev Apr 10, 2023
@LakiG LakiG deleted the feature/path_params branch April 10, 2023 11:58
lbeckman314 pushed a commit to lbeckman314/tes-compliance-suite that referenced this pull request Apr 22, 2023
lbeckman314 added a commit to lbeckman314/tes-compliance-suite that referenced this pull request Apr 28, 2023
Co-authored-by: Liam Beckman <lbeckman314@gmail.com>

feat: add filter functionality and tests (elixir-cloud-aai#33)

feat: add test file description in report (elixir-cloud-aai#41)

feat: add path parameters (elixir-cloud-aai#44)

feat: add test for ignore_error flag (TES v1.1.0) (elixir-cloud-aai#45)

feat: add tests for pagination options (elixir-cloud-aai#47)

feat: support query parameter transformation (elixir-cloud-aai#46)

Exit test suite with error code if any tests fail
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Allow multiple arbitrary URL params in endpoints
2 participants