[ENHANCEMENT] Deprecate Travis CI support #10350
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
bertdeblock
changed the title
bertdeblock
force-pushed
the
deprecate-travis-ci-support
branch
2 times, most recently
from
7604782
to
1404809
Compare
bertdeblock
commented
Aug 21, 2023
locks
previously requested changes
Aug 28, 2023
tests/fixtures/app/with-blueprint-override-lint-fail/.travis.yml
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
Opened a PR so we can get a good idea of the final link: ember-learn/deprecation-app#1338. |
Merged
9 tasks
|
The RFC for this is now Ready to Release, so this can be released and should be reported back on emberjs/rfcs#978 |
Co-authored-by: Ricardo Mendes <rokusu@gmail.com>
kategengler
force-pushed
the
deprecate-travis-ci-support
branch
from
3333c6a
to
7b31e5e
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Implements emberjs/rfcs#918.
The first commit isn't a necessity, but I think it makes deprecations more readable (a bit "heavier" though).
Example: