You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Current behavior:
When we make a new folder of versions, we risk creating more work/losing valuable work when open PRs are still pointed at earlier versions. We also lose the git history.
Desired behavior:
We don't need to duplicate work when a new version is cut.
Options:
merge or close PRs before making a new version
make a "current" folder that holds the next version, and PRs always go there
???
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Personally I'd say the current directory makes more sense, as there'll always be times a PR isn't ready for the release and you don't want to be rushed into merging it to avoid work later.
As you say, if fixes all point at master, you only ever have to worry about backporting, and you can judge whether its worth it based on the importance. Typos, for example, could probably just be left in most cases
New features would need to be documented early in Dev cycle in the guides going forward since some of them require more time for review. Their content usually goes into n+2nd folder if 'n' is the current version of guides. This is an additional constraint to account for
Current behavior:
When we make a new folder of versions, we risk creating more work/losing valuable work when open PRs are still pointed at earlier versions. We also lose the git history.
Desired behavior:
We don't need to duplicate work when a new version is cut.
Options:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: