Support namespaced references in resolver

[joefiorini]

• Requires separating namespace components with "/"
• Assumes it can access all components using normal "." notation

This enables us to reference namespaced routes using the new routing syntax. So we can support all of:

App.IndexRoute => match("/").to("index")
App.Users.IndexRoute => match("/users").to("users/index")

[trek]

Could you add some tests? I don't think this will get merged without tests.

[joefiorini]

I could not find tests around this behavior so I wasn't sure what to write. Where would these tests go? Application or Container?

On Jan 6, 2013, at 7:31 AM, Trek Glowacki notifications@github.com wrote:

Could you add some tests? I don't think this will get merged without tests.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

[darthdeus]

This would be so sweet, +1

[tchak]

Do we really want this? App.Users is not a real namespace in sens of Ember (we do not support nested namespaces). When people will se this, they will try App.Models.User, and it will not work because Models can not be a namespace and toString method will not work and models will get bad urls... People will cry... I am already crying...

[tchak]

👎

[joefiorini]

Then I guess the real question is why doesn't Ember support nested namespaces (in the Javascript sense, not Ember namespaces)?

On Jan 7, 2013, at 6:02 PM, Paul Chavard notifications@github.com wrote:

Do we really want this? App.Users is not a real namespace in sens of Ember (we do not support nested namespaces). When people will se this, they will try App.Models.User, and it will not work because Models can not be a namespace and toString method will not work and models will get bad urls... People will cry... I am already crying...

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

[wycats]

We have other plans for nested namespaces. We'll revisit this once the dust settles from all the current router changes.

[joefiorini]

Cool, thanks @wycats. The whole "Ember namespaces are not real namespaces" thing is fairly confusing, so I'm looking forward to seeing what you come up with.