ICWSM and UAB integration #365
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Hi - Adding a new conference needs to be raised as an issue, not as a PR. Please separate out the faculty updates as a separate PR. Thanks. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This pull request has a fully generated site which adds ICWSM to the Web & Information retrieval category. There are only two venues currently in the Web & Information retrieval category already: WWW and SIGIR.
ICWSM is arguably at least as strong a venue as SIGIR (it has a higher h5 ranking and a substantially higher h5 than SIGIR according to Google scholar).
This pull request also includes some faculty from the University of Alabama at Birmingham and is fully generated, ready to go live (at least it looked ready to go live on my machine :)).
Please disregard #364 if this pull request is deemed suitable.