Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

v3.6.0 lost the "force heating off" option #1262

Closed
proddy opened this issue Aug 13, 2023 · 10 comments
Closed

v3.6.0 lost the "force heating off" option #1262

proddy opened this issue Aug 13, 2023 · 10 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request question Question about something
Milestone

Comments

@proddy
Copy link
Contributor

proddy commented Aug 13, 2023

          v3.6.0 lost the "force heating off" option. Downgrading to v3.5.1 fixes the issue.

Originally posted by @martini1992 in #951 (comment)

@proddy proddy added the bug Something isn't working label Aug 13, 2023
@proddy proddy added this to the v3.6.0 milestone Aug 13, 2023
@proddy proddy assigned proddy and MichaelDvP and unassigned proddy Aug 13, 2023
@martini1992
Copy link

Specifically makes the device unusable when using it as an interface for more complex control through Home Assistant. Due to not using the new scheduler functionality in EMS-ESP.

@proddy proddy removed the bug Something isn't working label Aug 14, 2023
@proddy proddy removed this from the v3.6.0 milestone Aug 14, 2023
@proddy proddy added the question Question about something label Aug 14, 2023
@ahhoj
Copy link

ahhoj commented Aug 18, 2023

I checked how the scheduler works in v3.6.0. I think the functionality itself is clear. Most probably it is only my fault but didn't quite find out what messages should I send every minute. I know it is present in the #951 issue, but still couldn't figure out (admitedly I didn't spend much time with it :) ). It could be nice to have a wiki guide how to configure to mimic the earlier functioanlity: forceheatingoff (including the startup option).

@martini1992
Copy link

martini1992 commented Aug 18, 2023 via email

@MichaelDvP
Copy link
Contributor

I think only setting selflowtemp is enough, maybe it takes a few seconds until the boiler stops the burner, but it should work.
If not, you can set the whole telegram in the scheduler
grafik
or create a own entity as ULONG and schedule this entiy.

@jrb80
Copy link

jrb80 commented Sep 15, 2023

I also found this issue after upgrading to v3.6.1.

Is this entity permanently removed now?

@philipherbert
Copy link

Hello,

why is forceheatingoff no longer available ?
It is possible to set this via Buderus Controller to disable heating.

@proddy
Copy link
Contributor Author

proddy commented Oct 7, 2023

@MichaelDvP is it worth adding back this feature?

@philipherbert
Copy link

.just a short update from my side:

I needed to revert to 3.5.1 to be able to change this back to forceheatingoff = off.

This setting does not seem to have anything todo with setting on the UI of the boiler. (GB192i/2 BC400).

Emergency Mode overwrites ignores forceheatingoff anyway.

--Philip

@MichaelDvP
Copy link
Contributor

It's just a bit copy/paste, not much code. I'll make a PR, less work than discussing this further.

@MichaelDvP
Copy link
Contributor

@philipherbert

This setting does not seem to have anything todo with setting on the UI of the boiler. (GB192i/2 BC400).

Yes, see #951, it is a special ems-esp function to schedule a command for setting flowtemp and burner to zero. This is a workaround for boilers that can not set heating off by bus. It's not a entity of the boiler!

proddy added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 8, 2023
add forceheatingoff #1262 and header/heatblock #1317
@proddy proddy added the enhancement New feature or request label Oct 8, 2023
@proddy proddy added this to the v3.6.3 milestone Oct 8, 2023
@proddy proddy closed this as completed Nov 18, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request question Question about something
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants