Implement order by #70
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Sorry if not proper etiquette with respect to the prior pull request; however, the previous PR had dormant for over a year. |
AndTheDaysGoBy
force-pushed
the
implement-order-by
branch
from
ff6c420
to
2c71fc6
Compare
AndTheDaysGoBy
force-pushed
the
implement-order-by
branch
from
2c71fc6
to
f55003f
Compare
|
This PR or the previous one should really be looked into. This is core ORM functionality... |
|
Actually, this issue has returned to my spotlight when I was trying to use or implement something like django-chunkator, but that would require the ability to order_By. If only that was supported, django-chunkator may be able to be used as is, or, if not, easily be ported. |
Merged
aminalaee
requested changes
Aug 21, 2021
aminalaee
approved these changes
Aug 24, 2021
Closed
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixed according to the discussion in #26, e.g. generating a new QuerySet via init, and implemented order by. A timestamp was also added the
Usermodel in the tests for the sake of variance of types while testing order by.